I am glad (sincerely) that in your community and professional circles, you have never witnessed any support for CRT. But that is not proof it does not exist
Granted. But it's a data point, and it should feed into your own judgements about the education field, just like every other data point. What bothers me so often about NES is the tendency to generalize. Not all schools are the same, and plenty of teachers have no time for wokeness. Seek some out. Ask around. They're not hard to find.
I also read a surprising number of NES posts that excoriate "CRT," even though the posters don't really understand it. It's a very high-level academic theory that rarely shows up in elementary or secondary instruction. It's become a boogeyman, from what I can see. I've posted about my thoughts on this before; I'll try to find the post.
ETA: Here it is. Enjoy. Read a few posts before and a few after, for context. It was a good discussion that got buried. Start around #1166 on that thread, or so.
Last edited: