Will more Youtube gun channels go to Pornhub?

I bet that a couple of helicopter rides would make a bunch of companies change their tune. We just let commies live and speak while commie don't let us do the same. You figure out what happens next.

Listen a**h***s, the only thing that's a real true private business is your lemonade stand. The bigger the co, the more it tries to suck up some taxpayer juice.
 
I think sites that are intended to be an alternative to something else, but are too specific such as "guns", are a problem getting people to move to. Facebook, for example, but the gun version.... who of my friends and family would I be able to get to migrate there? At most, I think I could count 4, and that's if they even bothered to migrate there with me. So, I would be able to see the cat and vacation pics of 1 relative and 3 friends, that's it. So, in reality, it would probably be just me and I'd have the most boring gunbook feed, not even worth checking. Facebook is only useful because everyone is there and I can see what crap they are up to and promptly chat with them. To be a viable alternative, I think it would still need to accept everyone for any topic, but not all the stupid garbage like censoring people's posts and taking a dump on anyone with a free thought all the time. So, Facebook, but free. But, you still have the network effect problem, trying to get the ball rolling and the whole thing started and have it reach critical mass. And while it could claim to be accepting of anyone's beliefs and not censor them, let's face it the lefties that you know won't really care about that since they aren't getting censored anyway, and being around alternative thoughts upsets them. So, lefties would not migrate to the FB alternative... it would still just be conservative and libertarian types. Again, most people I know would not migrate. For everyone to want to migrate, FB would have to start shitting on all the lefties too. So, I highly encourage them to do that, just go full retard and piss off everyone. Only then we may have another viable platform emerge.
I'm not on the facebooger and have zero intentions, or desire, to ever get an account there. I'd rather get a text message, phone call, or even email, when something is interesting. I keep in contact with a few people from my last job via Skype we used it at work, so everyone there has an account). There's even a group of people that no longer work there that we keep in contact via Skype. I tweaked mine to get rid of the farking ads too. :)

Maybe someone will be able to make ThePewTube channel/site and have deep enough pockets to make it work (as a viable alternative) without needing any kind of sponsorship. Of course, there are also ways to generate revenue via clicks on ads placed on the site/pages. So companies that wish to advertise on the site can provide some assistance that way. I don't think there's any way to get such a site (with it's compute requirements, especially as they grow) to be completely funded that way. Well, at least not initially. Perhaps after enough time, if it grows significantly, it will.

I think that if the site is made for a global audience, it has a better chance of success. Perhaps having regional sections, so that people in the US don't see the crap other countries are going through (unless you WANT to look at that).

Honestly, I think there already are alternative channels to uubetube that can be used. It's really going to just be a matter of where different channels land. I'm thinking about closing my 'youbtube' account and send them a message saying that it's due to their new restrictions on gun content.
 
Instead of having just one location for the videos, why not have a site that links to wherever the video is actually hosted/stored? Similar to how torrent sites operate. If they could properly write the tie-in they could even allow for sites put up on Google Drive or MS OneDrive.

You don't need billions to get such a site up and running in order to test draw to it. If you do it right, you could get sponsorship from gun manufacturers to allow you to increase capacity as demand increases. I would create a POC site first, then talk with the different gun manufacturers (globally) to see about getting sponsorship. You could come up with a sliding scale so that the amount they provide increases as the hits also increase (especially on videos of their products) that would allow you to increase compute and bandwidth as needed. You WILL need to locate a very open minded hosting company (or start one up for just this) for this to live. At least initially.

Sounds like you've got a good start on a plan. Write it up and crowdsource the funding. Who knows, you could be the next Zuckerberg.
 
Sounds like you've got a good start on a plan. Write it up and crowdsource the funding. Who knows, you could be the next Zuckerberg.
Then create a crypto currency around it. Hook me up when you become a billionaire.
 
Sounds like you've got a good start on a plan. Write it up and crowdsource the funding. Who knows, you could be the next Zuckerberg.
Maybe I will. Would need to check the costs for colo sites (would look in NH, and other 'free' states first) to see what kind of costs are there. Not sure what the software to run the site would cost. I'm sure it could be put onto Linux servers though (IMO, a smart choice for these things).
Then create a crypto currency around it. Hook me up when you become a billionaire.
After I've made a few billion, I'm sure I could do something... IF I remember that is. [rofl2] Or maybe offer you a ride once I have my own tank. [rofl2]
 
Maybe I will. Would need to check the costs for colo sites (would look in NH, and other 'free' states first) to see what kind of costs are there. Not sure what the software to run the site would cost. I'm sure it could be put onto Linux servers though (IMO, a smart choice for these things).

After I've made a few billion, I'm sure I could do something... IF I remember that is. [rofl2] Or maybe offer you a ride once I have my own tank. [rofl2]

Don't host in the US, go overseas to someplace protected, where is wikileaks hosted? The site as you describe it is based on links, not actual hosted content (although I think this is a flaw) so bandwidth requirements are going to be very low, comparatively speaking.

And as long as the provider can scale up the horsepower you can start with next to nothing, probably get online for $10.00 a month, add resources as you add users. Host banner adds to fund upgrades, the income will scale with the use, which drives the resource requirements.

Now just write the site, because trying this by licensing software is going to be way more expensive and you will still be at the mercy of the provider. If people bitch to them you're SOL.
 
Don't host in the US, go overseas to someplace protected, where is wikileaks hosted? The site as you describe it is based on links, not actual hosted content (although I think this is a flaw) so bandwidth requirements are going to be very low, comparatively speaking.

And as long as the provider can scale up the horsepower you can start with next to nothing, probably get online for $10.00 a month, add resources as you add users. Host banner adds to fund upgrades, the income will scale with the use, which drives the resource requirements.

Now just write the site, because trying this by licensing software is going to be way more expensive and you will still be at the mercy of the provider. If people bitch to them you're SOL.
I'll have to check with some people I know that can write good code... I might be able to do it, but it would take me a LOT longer and probably require a lot of fixing/correcting before it's even close to ready.
 
Don't host in the US, go overseas to someplace protected, where is wikileaks hosted? The site as you describe it is based on links, not actual hosted content (although I think this is a flaw) so bandwidth requirements are going to be very low, comparatively speaking.

unfortunately it has been a formula a really long time. US hasn't been a land of the free, .gov any big corp can force your host to take your site down for any reason they want.

Also, you will find many other places outside of US that are cheaper too.
 
You must have married pretty young.

Feb 1993 — the Internet is officially launched

Mar 1993 — the largest ‘child pornography’ investigation in history is initiated, after a series of websites (eventually tracked to Denmark) make huge vaults of underage smut available to the masses, via the internet.

1995 — A study of Usenet reveals >80% of traffic is porn-related. TIME magazine runs story as “CYBERPORN” exposé. Study was later found to be flawed, and TIME issued a partial retraction.

A partial retraction??? Is that like, "Just the tip"??




;)
 
Instead of having just one location for the videos, why not have a site that links to wherever the video is actually hosted/stored? Similar to how torrent sites operate. If they could properly write the tie-in they could even allow for sites put up on Google Drive or MS OneDrive.
Monetization is what pays for the infrastructure and bandwidth; hosting and streaming videos is both storage and bandwidth intensive, Google/Drive and OneDrive aren't going to let you use them as your streaming service for free. The other thorny issue is how to solve the problem of remuneration of the content producer.

D.Tube attempts to solve all of these issues by moving the video into IPFS (p2p) but while indexing is in STEEM (blockchain), Uploading and search is still centralized. The founder has basically said that decentralizing search is a difficult problem and not one he is interested in putting effort into.
 
I think the long term solution to the issue of Youtube's monopoly on video hosting services is going to be that as technology gets better, as data storage becomes cheaper and data transfer speeds increase, that's when it will allow a startup to create a website like youtube, but for a very low cost. When the costs come down, the cost of advertising will too, so at that point it will allow a Guntube or Freedomtube to be created that will be able to pay content creators again. Hell, if could mean that the content creators themselves could directly receive and negotiate with advertisers and sponsors because they could be the ones owning the video servers.

In the short term, Youtube gets to censor gun videos and basically ban them and Pornhub and Full30 becomes the only other venues to upload videos to. I'm just glad to hear that Pornhub is open to bringing in exiled youtube channels. I already support Pornhub when it comes to watching porno, now I'll just be outspoken and tell people to stop watching Youtube and go to Pornhub to watch Alex Jones or PewDiPie or whoever else their preferred internet content creators are.

BTW, not saying Alex Jones or PewDiPie upload videos to Pornhub, but I'm sure they're considering it after what's happened to them in the past and was just announced this week.
 
I think PH might create an alternate website that uses their same back-end infrastructure. Call it Phub or P-Tube or something, same website interface etc, just for regular videos like Goolag's YouTube used to be instead of t3h pr0n. The diversification could build their business exponentially. I also find it really funny that them and 4Chan have inadvertently turned into libertarian heroes by be willing to allow all lawful content no matter how distasteful to different points of view.
 
there is that discussion about poor YouTube and cost of hosting ... if you look into how Google has been throwing money away on stupid shit, literally stupid shit for shits and giggles, inventing new languages, creating a google ventures etc. they are not hurting for money, this has nothing to do with cash flow, merely few people at the top making a name for themselves among gun grabbers. I'd love to know all those names for posterity.

Hosting prices have dropped, price of storage has dropped as well. A lot of movies on YT are not HD, they are crap quality.

In any case, singling out guns is discrimination. They are trying to play the censor and tell me what's moral or not.
 
there is that discussion about poor YouTube and cost of hosting ... if you look into how Google has been throwing money away on stupid shit, literally stupid shit for shits and giggles, inventing new languages, creating a google ventures etc. they are not hurting for money, this has nothing to do with cash flow, merely few people at the top making a name for themselves among gun grabbers. I'd love to know all those names for posterity.

Hosting prices have dropped, price of storage has dropped as well. A lot of movies on YT are not HD, they are crap quality.

In any case, singling out guns is discrimination. They are trying to play the censor and tell me what's moral or not.
Google IS the Deep State government. Thats why Youtube is the only non-porn video hosting service that doesnt have to worry about bankruptcy.
 
The thing is, besides youtube, most of the sites mentioned are NOT widely know.

I know of vimeo, dailymotion, liveleak and twitch. If one of these is known to be Pro 2A or at least neutral, let's try it out.

I have one popular video, on riveting an M1919. I'll post it and see what happens. Maybe it'll start a movement, like Alice's Restaurant.
 
I wonder if they can pass a bill to recognize the 2A as a federally-protected civil right. Let’s see where something like that takes us.
 
I don't see Gab TV section mentioned - could be a viable alternative.
GAB

I knew about Gab as a twitter alternative, but I didn't realize they hosted video. I'll have to consider that one too.

I've been trying to use d.tube and bitchute lately. I haven't decided yet which I like better, although bitchute is much simpler to set up an account with. It uses bittorrent to keep their bandwidth requirements lower. Although, I guess they still have to spend a lot to host the videos.
 
Back
Top Bottom