- Joined
- Feb 6, 2024
- Messages
- 176
- Likes
- 304
The NRA Is About to Notch Another Legal Victory at the Supreme Court
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Based a some recent decisions, SC is compromised and can no longer be depended on to do what is rightSCOTUS is our first and last hope.
what decisions are you referring to,Based a some recent decisions, SC is compromised and can no longer be depended on to do what is right
Based on that pic on the video, I would have swore it was the fat guy in his mom's basement video. But I'm not sure if a bad toupee is any better to look at. ROFL!!!!
Especially THIRTY-ONE MINUTES!!!! Damn.
SCOTUS is our first and last hope.
But they are taking from us, aren't they?I disagree. Our natural and Constitution right to keep and bear arms is.
lmaoBut they are taking from us, aren't they?
The ones he disagreed withwhat decisions are you referring to,
Will the tyrant comply? SCOTUS has zero teeth anymore
Justice Sotomoyer wrote the opinion with a concurrence by Justice Gorsuch more or less admonishing the lower courts to stop using such a convoluted framework. OTOH, Justice Jackson wrote a concurring opinion that read more like a dissent. In fact she refers to "the majority opinion" and recommends that the lower courts find a way around the very decision that she voted in favor of.
At least that's how I read that.
What else would you expect from Justice Jackson who couldn't define what a woman is?
I wonder if she even knew how she was voting? She's as bright as the guy who appointed her.
Someone probably told her "if you are the lone dissenter you are no longer going to be able to pretend that you're not retarded, so don't do that. "
I mean this is a slam dunk retard level 1A case, it sounds like all of the justices were annoyed it even went that far, given its basically a virtue signaling temper tantrrum very similar to a case that was brought in CA where it was ruled the state couldnt snuff someones 1A speech (based off a gun logo on a sign).
Quoted from an Insurance trade article. The case was about Insurance.
The U.S. Supreme Court has revived a claim by the National Rifle Association (NRA) that a former New York regulator allegedly violated the organization’s First Amendment rights by coercing insurers and banks to terminate their business relationships with the NRA in order to punish or suppress the NRA’s gun rights advocacy.
“Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors,” the court declared in a unanimous opinion written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
And what is the remedy? It’s too late now ?
Sue the f*** out of Vullo, who may not have qualified immunity and therefore may be on the hook personally for her actions.And what is the remedy? It’s too late now ?
Reading through the Opinion of the Court, it was clear that eight of them thought it was stupid of New York to try an end run around the 1st Amendment by EXTORTING non involved parties into doing the state's dirty work.
Jackson seemed to say that doing that was fine, but that the state's extortion letter should have been more subtle.
Reading through the Opinion of the Court, it was clear that eight of them thought it was stupid of New York to try an end run around the 1st Amendment by EXTORTING non involved parties into doing the state's dirty work.
Jackson seemed to say that doing that was fine, but that the state's extortion letter should have been more subtle.