Sorry to hear you've had problems with your Ruger MKIII. My MKII has been very reliable.
Yeah I'm sure I just happened to get a finicky one. I'm going to try the recommended VQ extractor.
![Grin [grin] [grin]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/041.gif)
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Sorry to hear you've had problems with your Ruger MKIII. My MKII has been very reliable.
Yeah I'm sure I just happened to get a finicky one. I'm going to try the recommended VQ extractor.![]()
Well my local gun shop didn't have any type of .22 in stock for me to check out. I am going to go to another one this weekend. My local shop only has Brownings and Rugers so I will need to go to another anyway to check out other brands. Anyone else have an opinion on the Browning?
If you start looking for a High Standard, look for an old gun preferably with a 7 inch barrel, East Hartford or Hamden, the new Texas guns are horrible. They are great shooters but they are known to finicky with magazines and ammo. I got lucky with the 5 new mags that I bought for my Supermatic Trophy, they all feed flawlessly.
If you opt for a new gun, don't forget to look at the Browning Buckmarks. There is a target model with an adjustable rear sight. Also a very nice shooter, my S/O has one and it shoots almost as nice as my 35 year old Trophy.
The High Standards are a little out of my range I am looking to keep it under 400 dollars. What brands should be avoided at all cost.....if any?
The High Standards are a little out of my range I am looking to keep it under 400 dollars. What brands should be avoided at all cost.....if any?
Stay away from the Walther P22.
Probably cause it's not a 45 and not a gun he's ever even seen or held or shot and owned. IMHOWhy do you say this? What is the issue(s) with the Walther?
Probably cause it's not a 45 and not a gun he's ever even seen or held or shot and owned. IMHO
Too funny. It seems with the surfing I have been doing that the Ruger is the most recommended .22. Is the reason for this the amount of customization that can be done to it or is it just a good overall piece.
Probably cause it's not a 45 and not a gun he's ever even seen or held or shot and owned. IMHO
Too funny. It seems with the surfing I have been doing that the Ruger is the most recommended .22. Is the reason for this the amount of customization that can be done to it or is it just a good overall piece.
Cars cost more, and take up more room. And it is easier to hide a new gun from your SO than a new carThis is getting as expensive as my car obsession.
PAT RI, if you can buy a Buckmark in RI, it's a great gun. They aren't on the approved list here in Mass. They bring big bucks here if you can find them. For actual retail price I would consider it a bargian.
I've had one since 1993, and I love it. I have the Ruger MK1 and MKll also, and at least a dozen other .22's. The Buckmark is a modernized version of the old Colt Woodsman, and it is a fine firearm. Quality and service equal to the Ruger, but without as many add on accessories.
Everyone who fires my Buckmark wants one.