80 grain SMK's loaded on a Dillon 650 with TAC powder & CCI 450 primers through a White Oak Armament 20" SDM fluted upper:
(The 25.4 was basically for shits & giggles to see if all of the powder had been burned in the bbl at that point)
On to the 90 gr:
Oh and yeah, I know that's a lot of powder and yes I'm checking cases.
As promised, the case/primer pics:
You can see the primers start to really flatten and push back as the loads increase. I don't need the max loads here anyways: 23 grains of TAC behind the 90 gr SMK gets me 2591 FPS at 20' which is 1206 FPS at 1,000 y for exactly 10.0 MIL's of elevation.
- - - Updated - - -
My SMK / TAC loads had plenty of accuracy yesterday: 80 grains had no trouble out to 950 yards (I brought 20 and ran out hitting the 44% IPSC torsos at 750 & 950) and the 90's connected with a 2/3 IPSC torso at 1,015. I am still unsure which load to stay with so I think further testing would be called for (more shooting ) before I settle on 80 or 90. The wind varied quite a bit from tail winds to cross winds and that was my biggest struggle and why I would opt for the heavier bullet.
I had a great spotter (thanks Lawrence) who helped a great deal with the wind and was able to dial in his adjustments on the SWFA scope like a pro. Very happy with the White Oak SDM, Geiselle NM DMR trigger, SWFA 3-15x scope, and the Sierra Match King bullets yesterday. Very happy.
There are a few things that I can do to tighten up accuracy: Weigh powder charges for each round, use a single stage press (these were on a 650), and seat off the lands as previously suggested. For basic reloads of 90 grain SMK's and a fairly cheap powder I am more than pleased with the results.
A comparison between a 77 grain SMK magazine length round and the 90 grain SMK round loaded at 2.54 OAL:
Comparator kit & OAL gauges:
http://www.hornady.com/store/Bullet-Comparator-Kits/ http://www.hornady.com/store/OAL-Gauges/
(The 25.4 was basically for shits & giggles to see if all of the powder had been burned in the bbl at that point)
On to the 90 gr:
Oh and yeah, I know that's a lot of powder and yes I'm checking cases.
As promised, the case/primer pics:
You can see the primers start to really flatten and push back as the loads increase. I don't need the max loads here anyways: 23 grains of TAC behind the 90 gr SMK gets me 2591 FPS at 20' which is 1206 FPS at 1,000 y for exactly 10.0 MIL's of elevation.
- - - Updated - - -
My SMK / TAC loads had plenty of accuracy yesterday: 80 grains had no trouble out to 950 yards (I brought 20 and ran out hitting the 44% IPSC torsos at 750 & 950) and the 90's connected with a 2/3 IPSC torso at 1,015. I am still unsure which load to stay with so I think further testing would be called for (more shooting ) before I settle on 80 or 90. The wind varied quite a bit from tail winds to cross winds and that was my biggest struggle and why I would opt for the heavier bullet.
I had a great spotter (thanks Lawrence) who helped a great deal with the wind and was able to dial in his adjustments on the SWFA scope like a pro. Very happy with the White Oak SDM, Geiselle NM DMR trigger, SWFA 3-15x scope, and the Sierra Match King bullets yesterday. Very happy.
There are a few things that I can do to tighten up accuracy: Weigh powder charges for each round, use a single stage press (these were on a 650), and seat off the lands as previously suggested. For basic reloads of 90 grain SMK's and a fairly cheap powder I am more than pleased with the results.
A comparison between a 77 grain SMK magazine length round and the 90 grain SMK round loaded at 2.54 OAL:
Comparator kit & OAL gauges:
http://www.hornady.com/store/Bullet-Comparator-Kits/ http://www.hornady.com/store/OAL-Gauges/
Last edited: