yes. since this was my first glock i was unaware of the packing greese. i have it a quick inspection prior to shooting it first and was like "sweet, all lubed up".
also, when i consider shoudlering my brace i always look around for atf agents first.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Anyone have a sig mpx?
- Thread starter Minuteman Armament
- Start date
yes. since this was my first glock i was unaware of the packing greese. i have it a quick inspection prior to shooting it first and was like "sweet, all lubed up".
also, when i consider shoudlering my brace i always look around for atf agents first.
dcmdon
NES Member
Just a headsup to MA folks. A handgun like that with an armbrace wouldn't fly there. The gun is too heavy as a handgun and runs afoul of the AWB.
The only way to legally have a "correct" short barreled MPX is to register it as an SBR.
People can debate whether an SBR needs to comply with the AWB and therefore whether or not the telescoping stock can stay. I'm staying out of that one. I've heard both sides of the argument and don't really have an opinion.
The only way to legally have a "correct" short barreled MPX is to register it as an SBR.
People can debate whether an SBR needs to comply with the AWB and therefore whether or not the telescoping stock can stay. I'm staying out of that one. I've heard both sides of the argument and don't really have an opinion.
even though legal to have loaded in my car in NH, i'd expect the officer looking through my car not to know that and think it was a rifle, SBR, or whatever.
unless he is a sig guy...
