Army begins shipping improved 5.56mm cartridge

Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
266
Likes
19
Location
Derry, NH USA Earth Sol System
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Just enviro-hype or really a good round?

http://www.army.mil/-news/2010/06/23/41283-army-begins-shipping-improved-556mm-cartridge/


PICATINNY ARSENAL, N.J. (June 23, 2010) -- The Army announced today it has begun shipping its new 5.56mm cartridge, the M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round, to support warfighters in Afghanistan.

The new M855A1 round is sometimes referred to as "green ammo."

The new round replaces the current M855 5.56mm cartridge that has been used by U.S. troops since the early 1980s.

The M855A1 resulted in a number of significant enhancements not found in the current round, officials said. They explained these include improved hard-target capability, more dependable, consistent performance at all distances, improved accuracy, reduced muzzle flash and a higher velocity.
 
From the link you cited:
"According to Lt. Col. Jeffrey K. Woods, the program's product manager, the projectile is "the best general purpose 5.56mm round ever produced."
Woods said its fielding represents the most significant advancement in general purpose small caliber ammunition in decades.
The Enhanced Performance Round contains an environmentally-friendly projectile that eliminates up to 2,000 tons of lead from the manufacturing process each year in direct support of Army commitment to environmental stewardship.
Woods said the effort is a clear example of how "greening" a previously hazardous material can also provide extremely beneficial performance improvements.
The M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round is the first environmentally-friendly bullet resulting from a larger "greening" effort across the Army's Small Caliber Ammunition programs. Other greening efforts include 5.56mm tracer, 7.62mm ball and green primers."

I suppose if they reverted back to green fatigues, the world would be just perfect...totally harmonious...even Utopia!
 
I've worked with LTC Woods before, he's a great guy.
The purpose of the change was not to develop a "green" round. The Army wanted a round with increased ballistics and more effectiveness for the Soldiers on the ground. The new round does that. Anyone with significant experience with Military ammunition can attest to the lack of consistency and in some cases quality. The new round and new production methods at Lake City Arsenal will be a great advance for our Soldiers in the field.
As for lead being a natural element, that's true. Unfortunately, the US Military puts so much of it into the environment that we have several Military Installations that will eventually have to be considered Superfund Clean Up sites.
 
Lead leaching into drinking water happens under extremely acidic situations ONLY.

Cleaning up lead from bullets is as easy as scooping the ground up with a bulldozer/backhoe and sifting all the crap out of it to recover spent projectiles.

The bottom of Lake Erie just off the shore from Port Clinton Ohio has literally hundreds of tons of spent copper-jacketed lead cored projectiles from the firing ranges at Camp Perry.

If we do not stand united against the red herring of lead contamination, we do not deserve to win this fight.
 
Lead leaching into drinking water happens under extremely acidic situations ONLY.

Cleaning up lead from bullets is as easy as scooping the ground up with a bulldozer/backhoe and sifting all the crap out of it to recover spent projectiles.

The bottom of Lake Erie just off the shore from Port Clinton Ohio has literally hundreds of tons of spent copper-jacketed lead cored projectiles from the firing ranges at Camp Perry.

If we do not stand united against the red herring of lead contamination, we do not deserve to win this fight.

This... the lead leaching stuff is a bunch of crap.

It's going to be used as an end-around attack by antis to get ranges shut down, more or less.

I can sort of understand the concern with shot contamination, where you have like thousands of little lead particles all over, but bullets in soil don't exactly dissolve
easily.... people are still finding bullets in battlefields from the civil war and sometimes the revolutionary war.

-Mike
 
OK, dragging this thread back on topic...

U.S. Army Issues New M855A1 Ammo to Troops in Afghanistan

The U.S. Army has begun shipping its new, improved 5.56×45 cartridge, the M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round, to U.S. troops in Afghanistan. The Army will procure over 200 million rounds of the new M855A1 ammo in the next 12-15 months, and soldiers in Afghanistan will begin using M855A1 ammo in the summer of 2010. The new round replaces the current M855 cartridge used by U.S. troops since the early 1980s.

The military sought to replace current M855 ammo because M855 has not performed adequately in the Afghan theater. Specific complaints include: 1) inability to penetrate vehicle windshields; 2) poor long-range performance; and 3) failure to fragment even in short-range anti-personnel use. The Army’s Picatinny Arsenal claims that the new M855A1 has improved hard target capability, more consistent performance at all distances, improved accuracy, reduced muzzle flash, and higher velocity. M855A1 ammo is tailored for use in M4 carbines but should also give enhanced performance in M16s and M249s.

M855A1 ammunition ammo EPRNew Steel-Tip Bullet Design
The 62-grain bullet for the new M855A1 ammo is a completely new design. While it may appear to have a plastic “ballistic tip”, that’s deceiving. The new bullet created for M855A1 ammo has a bismuth-tin alloy core with a steel “stacked-cone” penetrating tip.

More info here.
 
The SS109 bullet used in the M885 used a sub-caliber conical tipped steel penetrator with lead filler and a copper jacket. When striking a hard target, the jacket and much of the filler material would peel away on the hard target and only the small penatrator would continue.

Looking at this design, the steel tip holds the front of the bullet and shields the front of the jacket and filler material, which should result in better penetration. The back-weighted bullet would reduce stability slightly, but the stacked configuration might facility fragmentation as the filler seperates from the penetrator and the back-weighted bullet should be a little less stable for improved toubling in soft targets.

The common problem with hard-tipped ammunition is deflection when striking a hard target at a slight angle (why the 30mm DU rounds have a blunt-tipped aluminium tip). I'd be interested in seeing how this new round compares to the SS109 when striking hard-steel plate at 10 or 15 degrees of angle.
 
Has anyone info on the terminal ballistics of this round? There are a lot of Trijicon TAO1's with the bullet drop compensator in the field and I wonder if the calibrations still hold true.
 
Of more interest....would they be getting rid of current stocks because of the new round??? May be an oppty to stock up on ammo.

Just a thought.
Jim
 
Has anyone info on the terminal ballistics of this round? There are a lot of Trijicon TAO1's with the bullet drop compensator in the field and I wonder if the calibrations still hold true.

The articles claim higher velocity and ballistic coefficient, which would suggest a flatter trajectory. Of course, if you're talking an inch or two less drop at 400-600 yards, I doubt it's enough to change the scope.

Looking at the specs, this round was developed agains a 3/8" (9.5mm) improvised balistic protection verse the SS109 (M885) round that was designed to defeat 4mm armor.
 
Back
Top Bottom