If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
They can try, but there is zero chance of the Hughes amendment being overridden. The government doesn't want citizens easily purchasing machine guns, so it isn't going to happen.
They can try, but there is zero chance of the Hughes amendment being overridden. The government doesn't want citizens easily purchasing machine guns, so it isn't going to happen.
Repealing the Hughes amendment would make it legal to build and register new transferable firearms. I won't make it any easier for anyone to get one, you would still have to jump through all the same hoops that you would now. To make it easier to purchase a machine gun would take the repeal of the 1934 National Firearms Act.
This. Given the re-equipment of the US military with select fire weapons after WWII, United States vs Miller should have been applied to overturn at least NFA34.repeal NFA34, GCA68, and then FOPA86 for the win. the liberty win.
Isn't this the same case that was already dismissed? The AR15.com sponsored suit? It crashed into a flaming heap before it got started.
Repealing the Hughes amendment would make it legal to build and register new transferable firearms. I won't make it any easier for anyone to get one, you would still have to jump through all the same hoops that you would now. To make it easier to purchase a machine gun would take the repeal of the 1934 National Firearms Act.