-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Can you believe this quote on health care?
- Thread starter AppleSeeds
- Start date
Kicker96FS
NES Member
Our founding fathers are spinning I tell you, spinning! ![[angry]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/008.gif "Angry [angry]")
I can't wait for it to pass. Then, according to Nancy Pelosi, we'll get to see what's in it.![[rolleyes]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/042.gif "Roll Eyes [rolleyes]")
I can't wait for Pelosi to pass.........
![[laugh2]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/014.gif "Laugh at above [laugh2]")
I passed a healthy Pelosi earlier today. Sorry, but I wasn't interested in what was in it, so I just flushed it away.
love the Avatar Ross.
In brightest day and darkest night,
No evel shall escape my sight.
Let those who worship evils might,
beware the power of Green Lantern's light!!!!! Boy do we need a super hero now.
dwarven1
Lonely Mountain Arms
Uh... Thanks for the compliment, but...
Jaxon's avatar is the Green Lantern... Mine is the Green Hornet.
"Another challenge for the Green Hornet, his aide Kato, and their rolling arsenal, the Black Beauty! On police records a wanted criminal, the Green Hornet is really Britt Reid, owner/publisher of the Daily Sentinel, his dual identity known only to his secretary and to the District Attorney.
"And now, to protect the rights and lives of decent citizens rides the Green Hornet!"
End threadjack.
Last edited:
I had heard the statement on the radio from the President. "Americans won't care how it gets done. Only that it does."
Sadly, he's probably more than half right.
Sadly, he's probably more than half right.
No he's not right, most of the country by a LARGE majority doesn't want this f-ing plan. There is now way around the numbers.
It will bankrupt an already bankrupt country. http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/03/17/cahill_attacks_health_care_law/
I agree. Even the MSM has polled out that no one wants it. I was referring more to his and congress' disdain for the mechanics of government and his assertion that people "won't care how it gets done."
Bill Nance
Banned
Get angry over something that's actually unethical or illegal. Strong-arming legislators is something the speaker and the president and the minority and majority leaders of every body do all the time and always has been. It's simply politics.
Some Presidents are legendary for the practice. Jackson and LBJ come to mind.
Exactly. If the public support were as large as the media & the left (same thing) claim, the bill would already be law. A lot of these guys know if they vote for this it's 'kiss your political a$$ goodbye next election' and they're worried. A lot of the rhetoric AND the media coverage is designed to convince you that it's a done deal to try and quash opposition.
Ya gotta love the "elements polled separately" talking points by the people who want this bill.
It works like these questions...
If the goernment had a program that gave luxury automobiles to people that applied, would you want one?
If the stimulus bill provided jobs for roofers by giving out a new roof for your house would you take it?
Those polls are easy when there is no cost as part of the analysis.
The question shouldn't be, "Do you want to mandate that insurance companies must take any policy applicant at the standard rates regardless of pre-existing conditions?" It should be _that_ with the addendum, "if that means your premiums will be $500 MORE per month."
That the media lets them get away with the talking points about benefits without costs, is atrocious..
It works like these questions...
If the goernment had a program that gave luxury automobiles to people that applied, would you want one?
If the stimulus bill provided jobs for roofers by giving out a new roof for your house would you take it?
Those polls are easy when there is no cost as part of the analysis.
The question shouldn't be, "Do you want to mandate that insurance companies must take any policy applicant at the standard rates regardless of pre-existing conditions?" It should be _that_ with the addendum, "if that means your premiums will be $500 MORE per month."
That the media lets them get away with the talking points about benefits without costs, is atrocious..
