I hope he doesn't cave in on this, otherwise pro-RKBA groups will have to look elsewhere for an incorporation case.
However... given Daleys reputation as pig-headed dictator, any concessions he makes probably won't be in line with the SCOTUS decision.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/24-7/1087669,CST-NWS-guns02.article#
However... given Daleys reputation as pig-headed dictator, any concessions he makes probably won't be in line with the SCOTUS decision.
Daley hints he may drop fight to keep handgun ban
Mayor Daley on Friday cracked the door open to abandoning the costly fight to uphold Chicago's 1982 handgun freeze -- if he can fashion a replacement ordinance that protects the safety of first-responders.
Until now, Daley had promised to defend Chicago's ordinance all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, despite what he called the dangerous precedent set by the court.
Daley pushing new gun ban measure Chicago continues to enforce gun ban
On June 26, the Supreme Court overturned a Washington, D.C., handgun ban on grounds that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to possess a handgun in your home for self-defense.
The National Rifle Association then filed lawsuits seeking to overturn handgun bans in Chicago, Morton Grove, Evanston and Oak Park.
Wilmette and Morton Grove preemptively repealed their bans.
Now that both suburbs have thrown in the towel, and newspaper editorials have urged Daley to do the same to save millions in legal costs on a fight he can't win, he appears to be having second thoughts.
At a news conference called to tout the 6,848 guns collected at last week's gun turn-in program, Daley was asked point-blank whether he would continue the legal fight to keep Chicago's handgun ban.
"We don't know yet. ... We're not gonna run away. We're gonna try to figure this out," he said.
Under further questioning, the mayor said city attorneys would simultaneously contest the law and work on a possible replacement.
Chicagoans with guns in their homes might be required to have insurance to protect taxpayers from frivolous lawsuits, he said.
"We're talking about putting first-responders in a very, very delicate position of people being armed without being notified how many guns they have in their homes," Daley said. "We have to be able to fashion a law that truly protects first-responders and protects the citizens."
http://www.suntimes.com/news/24-7/1087669,CST-NWS-guns02.article#