I can't help but wonder if people like the Bradies and Bloomburg got after him. They know if this goes to SCOTUS it could get incorporated under the 14th. And they probably don't want to take the chance that all their stupid infringements all over the country will get hosed.
I can't help but wonder if people like the Bradies and Bloomburg got after him. They know if this goes to SCOTUS it could get incorporated under the 14th. And they probably don't want to take the chance that all their stupid infringements all over the country will get hosed.
Yeah, but the idea is more or less the same. I doubt any court would see "moving out of the city" as being a reasonable restriction of any kind. It's
still pretty much a ban.
Yeah, but the idea is more or less the same. I doubt any court would see "moving out of the city" as being a reasonable restriction of any kind. It's
still pretty much a ban.
And, I seriously doubt this one will get out of California. It's conflicts with the state law, which, of course, never stopped SF before.
On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the California Court of Appeal upheld a district court decision, which found that the ordinance was pre-empted by several state laws, one of which prohibits cities from restricting handgun possession in an individual's home, business, or private property.