It's quite apparant that the warranty is not worth a lot.Just be careful here. If you let a smith rework the gun the warranty will more than likely fly out the window and you could get stuck btween that rock...
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
It's quite apparant that the warranty is not worth a lot.Just be careful here. If you let a smith rework the gun the warranty will more than likely fly out the window and you could get stuck btween that rock...
As lugnut and I both said from the beginning, go with the STI.
...
Had at least 4-5 failures today that really threw me off at HSC.
I'm torn as whether to dick around with the factory more or just take it to one of the local gunsmiths and have them figure it out.
Below is the exact text taken from the S&W Warranty page written in the owner's manuals. It specifically states that if a non-S&W gunsmith works on the gun it has to be with their authorization and use their procedures.
*********************************************************************
Smith & Wesson will not be responsible for:
• Defects or malfunctions resulting from careless handling,
unauthorized adjustments or modifications made or attempted
by anyone other than a qualified gunsmith following Smith &
Wesson authorized procedures, or failure to follow the disassembly
instructions in the Smith & Wesson manual.
Actually it says "...qualified gunsmith following Smith & Wesson authorized procedures..." Nothing about it having to be a S&W gunsmith.
Absolutely correct. The key is that the "procedure has to be authorized". I can't imagine that S&W will let some non-S&W smith do warranty covered work on their guns lightly. It just doesn't make sense for them.
What's to say a non-S&W 'smith can't get a copy of the procedures? Could just be semantics, but I'm not reading that as "If a non-S&W gunsmith touches it, your warranty is voided."
Absolutely correct. The key is that the "procedure has to be authorized". I can't imagine that S&W will let some non-S&W smith do warranty covered work on their guns lightly. It just doesn't make sense for them.
Sent back to the factory along with a full page detailing the problems. Hopefully they'll fix it right this time.
Sent back to the factory along with a full page detailing the problems. Hopefully they'll fix it right this time.
Don't hold your breath, they'll only change more parts.
Wow, this thread is really making me think I'm *not* going to get a S&W 1911... it'd been on my list....
Wow, this thread is really making me think I'm *not* going to get a S&W 1911... it'd been on my list....
No need to worry -- their .45s work. In general, 1911s are more reliable in .45. Other calibers are more likely to be problematic.Wow, this thread is really making me think I'm *not* going to get a S&W 1911... it'd been on my list....
Wow, this thread is really making me think I'm *not* going to get a S&W 1911... it'd been on my list....
Update: As expected, the note from S&W in the box (which, by the way, Fedex managed to turn into a passable facsimile of an accordion) says they replaced the extractor spring. Big whoop.
No need to worry -- their .45s work. In general, 1911s are more reliable in .45. Other calibers are more likely to be problematic.
I still want to shoot this gun. Come to Independent tomorrow and I will let you try my Springfield and will tell you who did the work
Plans this weekend unfortunately.
Well, no malfunctions yesterday at the Hampden match, nor today with another 250+ rounds down the pipe from four inexperienced shooters. Maybe it's fixed...
Found this old thread and I retract this statement. I have still had nothing but great luck shooting off a bench with emergency reloads but... Last night at HSC, I found that in SW1911 pro series 9mm, putting a full mag in after chambering a round, getting the mag to seat is difficult. Even with what I would consider a hard whack to seat, I still had issues. Mlaboss helped me determine it is that the spring tension in the mags is so tight you need to overcome it. It makes sense because the mag is hard to load at the end and I have two mags that came with it and two that I bought after. One set is better than the other.Bummer. I have nthing but great luck with mine
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Found this old thread and I retract this statement. I have still had nothing but great luck shooting off a bench with emergency reloads but... Last night at HSC, I found that in SW1911 pro series 9mm, putting a full mag in after chambering a round, getting the mag to seat is difficult. Even with what I would consider a hard whack to seat, I still had issues. Mlaboss helped me determine it is that the spring tension in the mags is so tight you need to overcome it. It makes sense because the mag is hard to load at the end and I have two mags that came with it and two that I bought after. One set is better than the other.
I'm still going to shoot it for the time being. I have a glock 17 but I would need to go get some gear, and I will just use what I have for now while I am learning.