Wait, whaa….Hunt Maine is a female???….Never happen.
I am waiting for her to answer my question.
The worst nightmare for a hypocrite is to be shown their own hypocrisy.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Wait, whaa….Hunt Maine is a female???….Never happen.
I am waiting for her to answer my question.
The worst nightmare for a hypocrite is to be shown their own hypocrisy.
There are not more women being beaten to a pulp than fake restraining orders, not even close. Are you gonna answer the question about a law-enforcement officer beating his wife into a pulp and still being able to carry at work?I agree with your statement. I’ve seen some abuse but more cases of women beaten to a pulp or worse this my opinion.
Yeah people should have all the same opinionFortunately for all of us, Bruen has made it harder for peoples' opinions to trump the Bill of Rights.
They are not more women being beaten to a pulp than fake restraining orders, not even close. Are you gonna answer the question about a law-enforcement officer beating his wife into a pulp and still being able to carry at work?
Sorry, I don’t condone or support people who beat their wives.
It is.
My sisters lawyer pushed it to point where my sister fired her because she wouldn't let up on it and just get down to the business of squaring away the paperwork .
That's all my sister wanted , she didn't hate the guy and they got along fine after till the day he passed away.
The bitch lawyer was more interested in destroying the guy's life than doing her job.
Good for you, I really don’t care what you think.No one here does, your nonsense logic is right up there with "if it only saves one life" or "you can't prove they didn't do it".
RO's aren't exclusively issued against people who beat their wives, in fact a valid argument can be made that more ROs are issued against people who never harmed their wives than those who did.
Good for you, I really don’t care what you think.
AlwaysYou care enough to respond though, don't you?
Notice how he/she isn’t answering the LEO question I asked him…he/she must be lonely with nothing better to do but trollYou care enough to respond though, don't you?
1000%No one here does, your nonsense logic is right up there with "if it only saves one life" or "you can't prove they didn't do it".
RO's aren't exclusively issued against people who beat their wives, in fact a valid argument can be made that more ROs are issued against people who never harmed their wives than those who did.
Yeah. The I don't condone wife beaters argument is right up there with the anti "you love your gunz moar than your chidren"Notice how he/she isn’t answering the LEO question I asked him…he/she must be lonely with nothing better to do but troll
If there is physical evidence, leave the guns (the victim may need them to defend herself, an RO won't stop bullets or a blade), and lock up the perp!!!I agree with your statement. I’ve seen some abuse but more cases of women beaten to a pulp or worse this my opinion.
And people wonder why guys just snap.I met a homeless veteran that lost visitation rights to his kids because he was in federal prison (taxes, had owned a failed restaurant that he tried to save by dodging taxes trying to dig himself out debt) and couldn't appear on a court date set by a moron state judge. When he was released from federal custody and went back before the moron state judge to try and regain visitation rights, the state judge threw him in jail for his previous failure to appear. Judge gaveled in the proceedings, said "oh I remember you", immediately recessed, went to his chambers, walked back out with a bench warrant and had him taken into custody. "Because you are going back to jail for x months for failure to appear, your appeal is denied."
He didn't get to see his kids until they graduated high school and got away from mom & her new husband.
Legit RO's vs B.S. ones are probably ten to one on the B.S. side .While I don’t agree with a 5 yr old approach to insults and name calling I’ll engage. Yes if you have an RO for violence against your wife, indeed their should be a hold on your firearms. I don’t support men who beat their wives, not sure where you are on that. Now is the system perfect , no, never said it was. But just like you don’t take away all firearms because of school shootings, you should not allow people who have ROs for violence against their wives access to firearms.
People have tried to tell you that it's pretty much standard procedure in any divorce case now .Sure there are rare cases but you can’t convince me to support or condone people who beat their wives
I don't know how a judge can set a date for a court appearance and punish someone for not showing up, when it is known that the person cannot appear because they are incarcerated by another jurisdiction that won't allow them to appear on a whim. I've heard that this has occasionally happened to deployed service members, but that there's some legal protections in that circumstance?And people wonder why guys just snap.
Wait, whaa….Hunt Maine is a female???….
A temporary restraining order and a temporary removal of firearms is indeed warranted in many of these situations.
Children do not lie and have no reason to lie regards molestation. Women wives girlfriends or in your case boyfriends , do lie about getting abused as it serves as great purpose.You asked a hypothetical and I asked one in return. You keep pushing the point that unless there is a trial and verdict of guilt a wife beater with an RO should not lose his rights to firearms. I’m asking a similar question but you want to babble the straw man phrase etc.
The solution here, although not an absolute solution, would be to severely punish those that lie to get a RO.I gotta admit I'm conflicted on this one
I was the guy who had his (former) wife call the police and say I hit her just to get me out of the house....oddly enough I wasn't even the same room.
The police were there for all of two minutes, started questioning her motives and constantly changing details and she recanted.
That was the last time I ever saw her outside of a court room. If she hadn't backed off and decided to file the RO my life would be different.
The one thing I always remember with her single friends is she was the first one to recommend they go down the court and get an order when a relationship went south if a guy just called back after he was asked to stop.
So yeah, it's horribly abused.
By the same token, that same women (off her meds) was hauled out of the house in cuffs years before and had an RO against her and I wouldn't want her to get anywhere near a firearm, or a drink or drug.
What sucks its impossible to tell who the psycho is.
I know I posted this in the MGTOW thread but………Hey HuntMaine, this is how they act before guys like you show up at the door…
View: https://youtu.be/-XZyHBwwVSM