Ma residents storing post 2016 in NH

[LakeTrout]

]

Because if the search is persuant to that investigation it’s usually for some offense that is a crime in both states.

I could see that. But I would think that possession of firearms in another state is still something that MA can’t pursue in addition to the other crime that they’re obtaining a warrant for. Only the other state’s law regarding possession in the other state applies.

I can see a firearm related charge for something like trafficking illegal firearms into MA from another state. But simply possessing them in another state isn’t something that MA has any jurisdiction over, whether or not the person is a MA resident.

 

[drgrant]

I could see that. But I would think that possession of firearms in another state is still something that MA can’t pursue in addition to the other crime that they’re obtaining a warrant for. Only the other state’s law regarding possession in the other state applies.

I can see a firearm related charge for something like trafficking illegal firearms into MA from another state. But simply possessing them in another state isn’t something that MA has any jurisdiction over, whether or not the person is a MA resident.

You missed my point entirely when there are people who have felony indictments and there are open warrants / they will f***ing take everything/ (and when i mean they, i mean whoever is serving the process) wherever it lies they do not care whether a gun is legal or not. I'm not talking about this from a "mass trying to get people's guns point of view" I'm talking about it from a happenstance kind of a thing.

To be perfectly clear all of this 2016 bullshit I believe is Much Ado About Nothing. My point was that states can still "act orbitally" in the cases of someone being accused of other crimes. In this case the person is usually going to have much bigger things to deal with than losing their guns anyways so most of it is like tilting at windmills or something. I was just trying to make the point that states will gladly go on to other people's tyranny by extending warrants when it involves things like DV ROs, murder, rape, diddling or theft.

With regards to mass being able to prosecute somebody over this that has their gun stored somewhere else? Of course you are correct- of course it's f***ing impossible. That requires some extraordinary legal gymnastics to believe that it is. I remember a New Hampshire judge speaking on this kind of issue and some dumb f***ing prosecutor was trying to make a point that a guy had this gun that was illegal in Rhode Island to the state that he had come from.... the judge literally said to the prosecutor "well, we're not in Rhode Island. " the guy probably shut the f*** up about the gun after that.

 

[LakeTrout]

You missed my point entirely when there are people who have felony indictments and there are open warrants / they will f***ing take everything/ (and when i mean they, i mean whoever is serving the process) wherever it lies they do not care whether a gun is legal or not. I'm not talking about this from a "mass trying to get people's guns point of view" I'm talking about it from a happenstance kind of a thing.

To be perfectly clear all of this 2016 bullshit I believe is Much Ado About Nothing. My point was that states can still "act orbitally" in the cases of someone being accused of other crimes. In this case the person is usually going to have much bigger things to deal with than losing their guns anyways so most of it is like tilting at windmills or something. I was just trying to make the point that states will gladly go on to other people's tyranny by extending warrants when it involves things like DV ROs, murder, rape, diddling or theft.

I see your point now. I just wanted to make sure there wasn’t something I was unaware of with regard to residents of one state not being able to own something in another state that is legal to own in that other state.

 

[drgrant]

I see your point now. I just wanted to make sure there wasn’t something I was unaware of with regard to residents of one state not being able to own something in another state that is legal to own in that other state.

It's definitely no problem for a Mass resident to have a 20 foot container full of silencers machine guns and sawed off shotguns located in New Hampshire it's just that the logistics of doing such things is kind of awkward but it is certainly not illegal to have this arrangement.

 

[LakeTrout]

It's definitely no problem for a Mass resident to have a 20 foot container full of silencers machine guns and sawed off shotguns located in New Hampshire it's just that the logistics of doing such things is kind of awkward but it is certainly not illegal to have this arrangement.

Haha Ya that’s a good point. I’m not entirely sure how they would go about being able to purchase things freely. But if there are ways, then I’m sure there’s a camp or two up in NH full of some MA residents not-legal-in-MA toys.

 

[drgrant]

Haha Ya that’s a good point. I’m not entirely sure how they would go about being able to purchase things freely. But if there are ways, then I’m sure there’s a camp or two up in NH full of some MA residents not-legal-in-MA toys.

Dual residency and firearm trusts convey a lot of winning.