Maine resident admits selling firearms to Mass. felon

Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
1,200
Likes
34
Location
Harrison, Maine
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
The case highlights tension over the flow of guns from Maine to Massachusetts.

PORTLAND - A 38-year-old Acton man has pleaded guilty in federal court to a charge that he sold dozens of handguns to a convicted felon from Massachusetts, a case that highlighted the controversy over Maine guns making their way to the Bay State.

Randy Goodwin faces up to five years in prison when he is sentenced later this year.

According to U.S. District Court documents, Goodwin began selling guns in late September 2009 through the popular classified bulletin Uncle Henry's. Around that time, Goodwin also began buying guns from a federally licensed dealer in Waterboro.

Between September 2009 and January 2010, Goodwin sold close to 100 handguns to Joseph Burns, Assistant U.S. Attorney Darcie McElwee wrote in court summaries of the cases against both men.

With every purchase, Goodwin also provided Burns with a box of ammunition, the prosecutor wrote.

In turn, Burns distributed the guns in Massachusetts. In the fall and early winter of 2009, several guns traced to Goodwin were seized by police during arrests in Burns' hometown of Lynn, Mass.

Burns and another Massachusetts man, 24-year-old Marvin Davis of Boston, were arrested March 4 during a sting operation by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Burns allegedly drove Davis to the park-and-ride lot off the Maine Turnpike to buy guns from Goodwin. Agents monitored the transaction and arrested the men after they allegedly paid $600 for a 9 mm pistol and a .380-caliber pistol.

Davis is prohibited from possessing guns because of prior convictions for armed robbery, armed assault with intent to kill and drug distribution.

Burns pleaded guilty in June to a federal charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He faces up to 10 years in prison, and his sentencing date is scheduled for Oct. 7.

Davis has agreed to plead guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, and he also will plead guilty to a separate firearm possession charge in Massachusetts, according to court records. His case in Portland has been reassigned to the U.S. District Court in Boston.

The flow of guns from Maine to Massachusetts has been a source of tension.

Massachusetts requires all private sellers and all buyers in private sales to file a detailed report of the sale with a state criminal history board within seven days of the sale.

In Maine and several other states, private buyers of firearms must supply only proof of residency in that state. Recent proposals to toughen the regulations in Maine have failed in the Legislature.

In 2006, an advocacy group put a message on a 250-foot-long billboard near Fenway Park in Boston, claiming that Maine's lax gun-control laws were helping to fuel violence in the city.

Stanley Jenkins, 22, a member of a Boston street gang, was sentenced last year to 17½ years in prison for trafficking guns and drugs between Boston and Maine.

Jenkins recruited people to buy more than 20 guns through Uncle Henry's. He then sold some of the guns and distributed others to members of his gang, the Franklin Hill Giants.

SOURCE
 
"In Maine and several other states, private buyers of firearms must supply only proof of residency in that state. Recent proposals to toughen the regulations in Maine have failed in the Legislature. "

This guy from Maine sold to a guy from Mass. He obviously did not have Maine proof of residency. The guy broke the law. Why do we need to strengthen the current law that is not followed? (this is a rhetorical question..... I know, ,,, I get it)
 
Right-o. So "tougher" gun laws for those that ignore ANY law, that makes sense right?

The 1 gun a month would have affected theses guys how?
 
And even though this is evidence that Devalue's new law would be ineffective, the Glob will have an editorial out within a few hours giving their knee jerk reasoning that we need this law.

Restricting the rights of legal gun owners in Mass to only purchasing 1 gun a month will stop all the straw purchases in Maine from coming down...

Anyone else notice the lack of common sense here?
 
Looks like they should add castration (to avoid any more contamination of the gene pool) and a brand on the forehead.

5 years for each offense would be a good start, lets see he did it 100 times so 500 years, with good behavior we will let you out in 100 years
 
This guy Goodwin is a slime ball. Unfortunately he probably bought them legally and then resold them, illegally. This certainly should get him more than 5 years. the anti's in Maine will be all over this to pass stricter laws up there.
 
Why create more laws when they do not enforce the ones already on the books. It is ridiculous that this Maine guy sold over a hundred pistols to his Mass. buyer. It is illegal to sell a pistol to anyone outside your state of residence. Period. Put the perps in jail for 50 years w/o parole and plaster all over the media. Wake some of these idiots up.
 
24-year-old Marvin Davis of Boston

Davis is prohibited from possessing guns because of prior convictions for armed robbery, armed assault with intent to kill and drug distribution.
SOURCE

I wonder if this is part of the problem. A guy with 6 years being an adult, with a violent rap sheet, is on the street.
 
Davis is prohibited from possessing guns because of prior convictions for armed robbery, armed assault with intent to kill and drug distribution.

Why is this P.O.S. on the street? His lack of access to guns should be due to the fact that they don't sell them at the prison commissary.
 
I wonder how many people lost their lives in this little fiasco. Up to five years? Really.

Maybe the people responsible for a crime here are those who actually hurt people with the guns. Just maybe.

They should sue the firearms companies who made the guns too. After all, they supplied the guy who supplied the guy who supplied the guys. [rolleyes]
 
Man, some of you need to find some consistency in your values.

Clearly, dudes were up to no good.

But I thought some of you understood that there should not be any illegal guns, nor any illegal possessors of guns, just illegal actions with guns.

If dude A sells guns to dude B knowing that dude B is going to sell them to people who are going to use them in crimes... actual crimes, like robery, murder, rape... shit like that... Then nail em all on conspiricy to commit whatever charges.

If dude A sells guns to dude B knowing that dude B is going to sell the guns to a bunch of other people who cannot legally possess guns, but intend no harm to anyone else, then yes, it's a crime, but it's a malum prohibita crime, not a malum in se crime.

More than likely the article above details a situation of the former variety... but none of you are making that distinction. Anyone who voted in that poll about whether felons should be prohibited from guns needs to remember to be consistent in their beliefs.
 
More than likely the article above details a situation of the former variety... but none of you are making that distinction. Anyone who voted in that poll about whether felons should be prohibited from guns needs to remember to be consistent in their beliefs.

There is no consistency, just emotional responses: "Put away the scumbags... for the children." "How many people died from this."

How about, how many people shot other people, or committed any other crime (involving these weapons), and was arrested/put away for those crimes?
 
100 Federal counts of illegal interstate trafficking of firearms and he's only getting 5 years?

If he bought them with the intent of selling them to a prohibited person, shouldn't that also be 100 counts of "straw purchasing" and providing false information on the 4473 form too?

Seems like an awful short sentence for so many federal felonies.
 
Between September 2009 and January 2010, Goodwin sold close to 100 handguns

<devil's advocate>
That's about 25 guns/month. If Maine had a gun-a-month law, he'd only have been able to sell four guns in that timeframe.
</devil's advocate>

The guns must have all been private sales, 'cuz that's a lot of guns to be bought from shops.

I really hate stories like this, they're *exactly* the sort of thing that hoplophobes latch onto to defend retarded legislation like gun-a-month laws.
 
100 Federal counts of illegal interstate trafficking of firearms and he's only getting 5 years?

If he bought them with the intent of selling them to a prohibited person, shouldn't that also be 100 counts of "straw purchasing" and providing false information on the 4473 form too?

Seems like an awful short sentence for so many federal felonies.

No foolin'. Maybe the whole point was to DQ him. It's you or me they're really after.
 
This guy IS going to prison (albeit nowhere near long enough), so there ARE laws ALREADY in place to deal with selling guns to felons. No part of H.4102 would have stopped this from occuring. That is what some of the morons on Beacon Hill (including our Governor) just don't get.
 
100 Federal counts of illegal interstate trafficking of firearms and he's only getting 5 years?

If he bought them with the intent of selling them to a prohibited person, shouldn't that also be 100 counts of "straw purchasing" and providing false information on the 4473 form too?

Seems like an awful short sentence for so many federal felonies.

I agree the sentence is pretty short, but there are a few things to keep in mind...

-My guess is that Goodwin has no priors and is just a f**king idiot who was looking to make a quick buck. 5 years in the federal pen and becoming a PP pretty much ruins his life, anyways. No point in the feds paying all kinds of money to incarcerate a nonviolent felon for 20 years.

-They'd have to prove that he knowingly sold those guns to a prohibited person... unless the buyer admitted this up front, he has no way of knowing whether the guy is a thug or a gun collector.

-You can't get him on the 4473 violation because it's not imminently clear that he bought the guns with the intent of immediately reselling them to another person, or that the other guy was paying him in advance specifically to straw the guns. You probably could because he established a pattern, but it'd be a stretch. It'd be different if the actual buyer was waiting for hims outside the gun store, than the "chain" would be more provable that he intended to deliberately straw guns.

That only leaves him with basic trafficking charges.... which should yield more than 5 years for the number of counts... but see my first point.

It's still 5 more years than what Bailey and Rosenthal got for pulling a straw and then bragging about it in a newspaper article. [thinking]

-Mike
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom