Knob Creek
NES Member
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Just doesn't make sense to me, I have a right in mass, so long as I give the state $100 and accept the fact my rights may not be equal to the next door neighbors? bleh.
Just as an aside ... if any elements of the Mass LTC system were found to bu unconstitutional, would that affect people who had been previously convicted on LTC violations?
Just as an aside ... if any elements of the Mass LTC system were found to bu unconstitutional, would that affect people who had been previously convicted on LTC violations?
I wouldn't count on anything drastic right away. Self defense is only part of the picture... The culture of crime that has been created by the nanny/police state will take some time to correct.
Time to put a date/time stamp mark the Chicago violent crime statistics.......then watch them fall in the coming months as people start arming themselves and start defending themselves against the thugs that run their streets.
I wouldn't count on that. Much of the crime in cities like Chicago is criminal against criminal. Also, I think the belief that "more guns = less crime" is far too simplistic a view and as difficult to prove as "more guns = more crime". Correlation does not necessarily imply causation.
It would certainly make a good case. It would be difficult to say "we're grandfathering convictions from back when we didn't honor the Constitution".
That hasn't silenced or stopped the slavery reparations crowd. The only thing holding their case up and basically invalidating it is that there are no more previous slave owners alive to be held accountable.........there are politicians, judges, sherrifs, police chiefs and legislators still alive who have knowingly and willingly violated peoples rights in the past and could be held accountable in 2nd ammendment violations.
I wouldn't count on that. Much of the crime in cities like Chicago is criminal against criminal. Also, I think the belief that "more guns = less crime" is far too simplistic a view and as difficult to prove as "more guns = more crime". Correlation does not necessarily imply causation.
I agree, I hope you took my opinion as saying convictions should be struck down. Or am I reading it right?
the right to keep and bear arms is a privilege of American citizenship
from the decision:
So, no guns for aliens, legal or illegal.
from the decision:
the right to keep and bear arms is a privilege of American citizenship
So, no guns for aliens, legal or illegal.
from the decision:
So, no guns for aliens, legal or illegal.
A US Supreme Court ruling today extending the reach of the constitutional right to bear arms will likely have little effect on gun control laws in Massachusetts, according to the founder of a gun violence prevention group.
John E. Rosenthal, chairman of Stop Handgun Violence, said the 5-4 ruling in a case involving handgun bans in Chicago and its suburb of Oak Park, Ill., would probably have "little or no impact" in Massachusetts because there are no comparable bans here.
Massachusetts has for years had bans on military-style assault weapons and on cheap, crudely made handguns known as "Saturday Night Specials," Rosenthal said, but those prohibitions are likely to be considered "reasonable restrictions."
"We don't have an outright ban on handguns," said Rosenthal, a gun owner. "We only have an outright ban on 19 specifically defined military-style assault weapons...and Saturday night specials," he said.
Municipal respondent's remaining arguments are rejected because they are at war with Heller's central holding. In effect, they ask the Court to hold the right to keep and bear arms as subject to a different body of rules for incorporation that the other Bill of Rights guarantees.
Just a thought, could all LTC B or LTC A "restricted" licensees now get together in a huge lawsuit claiming their right to self defense under the 2nd has been violated?
I'd hold off on that one for a while. For the moment, the Court has held that Heller identifies only a right to possess a handgun in the home, something permitted under all LTC restrictions. In order for the Second Amendment to be offended by carrying restrictions, a court is going to have to rule that the Second Amendment also includes a right to carry a firearm in some, to be defined, circumstances.