My new Ruger SR45 and my thoughts

ThePreBanMan

NES Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
13,231
Likes
11,867
Location
A Fair Haven in an unfair state.
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
In the box:
The firearm obviously, 2 10 round mags, a mag loader, and a lock.

Initial thoughts: looks sharp. Grip was too big for my hand, even With thhe back strap reversed to the small option. More of a long grip, but is narrow. Trigger felt terrible. Very gritty with an uneven pull. We'll get to that in a minute. Seems overly complicated with its trigger safety, magazine disconnect, firing pin block and manual safety. You need the planets to align to get this thing to discharge. I don't like my firearms like that, so we'll get to that too.

So I get it home and field strip it. Firearm is fairly dirty. Must haven been some extensive test firing at the factory. I immediately notice that it has a cast slide and a cast barrel. Yes you heard right, a cast barrel. The rough finish on the unmachined parts would seem to indicate this anyway.

this pistol has a lot of moving parts and tiny springs. Just an observation.

So, what to do about this gritty uneven trigger? Well it simply would not do for me. So I quickly studied how the firearm works and got to work. I removed the striker and polished the shit out of the tab on the bottom of it. Next I took a stone to the stamped steal tab that engages the striker. Problem solved. While I had the striker out I also "forgot" to reinstall the magazine disconnect. [smile] Whoops. Second problem solved. After cleaning and some mobile 1 it's off to the range.

So I arrive with 100 rounds of Winchester white box. That is all I wanted to expend today with ammo so hard to find. With this ammo I had no jams, and one failed to fire. Examination of the cartridge revealed a moderate dimple that I think should have been a sufficient ding in the primer. So the failure was most likely the fault of the ammo. I re-chambered and sent it down range on the second attempt. Still, the dent in the primer didn't appear as deep as what my pistols with external hammers make - so it's a concern.

The rear sight is adjustable, which is a good thing because this firearm was about 4" to the left out of the box at 25 feet. Accuracy is very very good. Like 1" groups at 25 feet kind of good. Shoots better than I do. I could only get that group shooting with support from a bench and bag.

All things considered its a nice range gun for fun. I had purchased this with intention of replacing my Sig 226 in .40 that resides in my nightstand (yes it's locked so f*ck off Marsha). But now I think the Ruger will go in the safe and the Sig will stay in the night stand.

Ill post pics when I get on a computer later on. I'm on my iPad at the moment.

I hope this info was useful to some. If you don't like my write up perhaps you can post a link to one you've done so you can teach me how it's done.


edit: on the plus side, the manual says there is no known ammo that exceeds the firearms capability. So send all the +p down range you want.
 
Last edited:
Saw one at Tombstone Trading the other day, they look HUGE. Rugers don't do it for me, but it's nice to see an honest review of one. They're cheap, for sure.
 
Cast barrel should be the least of your worries. they are all rated for any ammo on the market, and I believe them having run some stupid hot shit thru my original sr9 and my ex's SR9c. The trigger on the other hand may be duke, but dry firing or some polishing if you are impatient always helps as well as removing the mag safety which you did.
 
Congrats on the new purchase. Do you mind if I ask how much you paid? Saw one for $550 yesterday.

wow, i thought suggested retail was supposed to be around $450

I paid $459, so I doubt their getting $550.

There's a sucker born every minute. I'm sure they'll get the $550 from someone

You should not pay more then say $450-$460 for one. Four Seasons has them for $430. $550 is damn near MSRP.

Too big?? You must have tiny hands. A Glock 21 is pretty thick in the grip, and this is the same size I believe.

Gun Review: Ruger SR45 | The Truth About GunsThe Truth About Guns


"The SR45 may look tall and tan and young and lovely but the gun is something of an optic illusion. The big Ruger’s exactly the same width as the sine qua non of full-size .45-caliber striker-fired polymer pistols: the 1.27″ wide Glock 21. Even though the American pistol holds three fewer cartridges than Gaston’s handiwork (10 vs. 13), an unloaded SR45 is almost four ounces heavier than a G21 (30.15 vs. 26.8 ounces). That said, no full-size .45 is for the feint of hip."
 
That's one of few disappointments I get from Ruger, why are their handguns so heavy? The SR9c would be perfect if it were 19-21 oz. it's almost 25oz unloaded IIRC. I know it is just a minor issue for most people but I don't like carrying heavier guns. *shrugs*. Still love you Ruger.
 
You should not pay more then say $450-$460 for one. Four Seasons has them for $430. $550 is damn near MSRP.

Too big?? You must have tiny hands. A Glock 21 is pretty thick in the grip, and this is the same size I believe.

Gun Review: Ruger SR45 | The Truth About GunsThe Truth About Guns


"The SR45 may look tall and tan and young and lovely but the gun is something of an optic illusion. The big Ruger’s exactly the same width as the sine qua non of full-size .45-caliber striker-fired polymer pistols: the 1.27″ wide Glock 21. Even though the American pistol holds three fewer cartridges than Gaston’s handiwork (10 vs. 13), an unloaded SR45 is almost four ounces heavier than a G21 (30.15 vs. 26.8 ounces). That said, no full-size .45 is for the feint of hip."

I'm pretty sure the listed width of the SR45 includes the ambi safety (i.e. maximum width), so the grip/frame should really be quite a bit slimmer. A Gunblast.com review indicates that grips on all of the full-size polymer SR guns are in fact the same width.......not sure if that's true.
 
I'm pretty sure the listed width of the SR45 includes the ambi safety (i.e. maximum width), so the grip/frame should really be quite a bit slimmer. A Gunblast.com review indicates that grips on all of the full-size polymer SR guns are in fact the same width.......not sure if that's true.

That proves my point then of this gun should not be that large unless you have really small hands. I have not held one myself yet, but plan on buying one hopefully soon.
 
Funny thing about the sticks of MA (west of like idk, Framingham), holy shit you guys pay a lot for ammo and firearms. 2 shops and I couldn't find a decent price on ANYTHING. I no longer take Four Seasons/Collectors for granted. Free market is awesome, but man did I see high prices.
 
That proves my point then of this gun should not be that large unless you have really small hands. I have not held one myself yet, but plan on buying one hopefully soon.


Its not that the grip is fat (as in width), its that its long (as in length) from the front to the back strap. I'm only 5'4" and I would say I do have hands smaller than the average fella. Its not bad, but I do wish I could get just a tad bit more finger wrap around it.

All in all its not a bad firearm. I won't be replacing my 226 at my bedside with it. But if it were all I had, I wouldn't feel uncomfortable with it there either. Its just that I have other options which I think are just better ones for that role. Those being either my 226 or my 92fs....

But firearms are like women, different assets appeal to different fellas. There is really no wrong choice - except not to have one at all.
 
Its not that the grip is fat (as in width), its that its long (as in length) from the front to the back strap. I'm only 5'4" and I would say I do have hands smaller than the average fella. Its not bad, but I do wish I could get just a tad bit more finger wrap around it.

All in all its not a bad firearm. I won't be replacing my 226 at my bedside with it. But if it were all I had, I wouldn't feel uncomfortable with it there either. Its just that I have other options which I think are just better ones for that role. Those being either my 226 or my 92fs....

But firearms are like women, different assets appeal to different fellas. There is really no wrong choice - except not to have one at all.

Maybe try some Talon Grips for it, to get a better grip on the gun??
 
That's one of few disappointments I get from Ruger, why are their handguns so heavy? The SR9c would be perfect if it were 19-21 oz. it's almost 25oz unloaded IIRC. I know it is just a minor issue for most people but I don't like carrying heavier guns. *shrugs*. Still love you Ruger.

Helps with recoil at least.
 
That's one of few disappointments I get from Ruger, why are their handguns so heavy? The SR9c would be perfect if it were 19-21 oz. it's almost 25oz unloaded IIRC. I know it is just a minor issue for most people but I don't like carrying heavier guns. *shrugs*. Still love you Ruger.

It's one of the things you lose when buying a value grade gun, not really much you can do about that. "You can't get there from here." With a good belt and holster its not really a big deal.

-Mike
 
I immediately notice that it has a cast slide and a cast barrel. Yes you heard right, a cast barrel. The rough finish on the unmachined parts would seem to indicate this anyway.

What does this mean?

So, what to do about this gritty uneven trigger? Well it simply would not do for me. So I quickly studied how the firearm works and got to work. I removed the striker and polished the shit out of the tab on the bottom of it. Next I took a stone to the stamped steal tab that engages the striker. Problem solved.

I just bought a SR40, I assume it will have the same issue. Is what you described doable for someone who this is their first pistol? Or should I get a "trigger job," and of so, is that essentially just replacing the trigger mechanism? Who does that, a gunsmith?

Thanks for the help and for the great write-up!
 
Back
Top Bottom