Back in the day, we'd train with 7Bs during daylight by putting the "objective lens dust cap" on and then practice SOPs/IADs.Too early in the day for a night vision thread
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Back in the day, we'd train with 7Bs during daylight by putting the "objective lens dust cap" on and then practice SOPs/IADs.Too early in the day for a night vision thread
For "you get what you pay for" comparison:
![]()
With a screen name like that,I want royalties on this new forum!!![]()
it already exists .. its filed under Knights Armament i belive lolSo is someone going to post a "shut up poors" thread?
Nope, these are the budget WPthat has to be L3 unfilmed correct? crystal!
Nope, these are the budget WP
Im still just using the single tube and its enough to have fun with on atvs.Yeah man, I had a L3 filmless WP tube in my PVS14 that had a spec sheet with numbers so high that the sheet chasers were beating off over it when I had to sell it. It looked great for sure, but when I finally recooped the money from my dogs surgery I bought a set of thin filmed WP RNVGs and I can't really tell the difference. I don't fly helicopters with them or nothing, but as a casual user my current tubes are plenty fine.
View attachment 590898
Chasing numbers on a paper is lame, it's like dudes that pain over the dB rating of suppressors. It's a waste of time that you could be out training or running F&G in the dark.Im still just using the single tube and its enough to have fun with on atvs.
I don't have enough money to go hardcore on the numbers
I was always curious - if you use those tubes with a regular scope - are they capable to get any IR spectrum passed through the scope glass or it is useless?Yeah man, I had a L3 filmless WP tube in my PVS14 that had a spec sheet with numbers so high that the sheet chasers were beating off over it when I had to sell it. It looked great for sure, but when I finally recooped the money from my dogs surgery I bought a set of thin filmed WP RNVGs and I can't really tell the difference. I don't fly helicopters with them or nothing, but as a casual user my current tubes are plenty fine.
View attachment 590898
You mean like aiming passively? I do that with red dots all the time. Using a scope passively? I am sure you could if you had reticle illumination, I have not tried. Seems like a lot of glass and focal adjustments to line up to make it usable. They make clip on devices like the PVS-30 that are better suited for scoped night shooting. @AllaSnackbah will have to look down his nose while telling us more about that one though.I was always curious - if you use those tubes with a regular scope - are they capable to get any IR spectrum passed through the scope glass or it is useless?
i am really curious if it works at all - but i do understand, to line up those goggles with an eye box of a scope will probably be some weird trick. plus, not probably going to be easy to move your head that far back compared to where it is supposed to be normally.You mean like aiming passively? I do that with red dots all the time. Using a scope passively? I am sure you could if you had reticle illumination, I have not tried. Seems like a lot of glass and focal adjustments to line up to make it usable. They make clip on devices like the PVS-30 that are better suited for scoped night shooting. @AllaSnackbah will have to look down his nose while telling us more about that one though.
Yeah, it would probably have to be a big money LPVO with a super forgiving eye box.i am really curious if it works at all - but i do understand, to line up those goggles with an eye box of a scope will probably be some weird trick. plus, not probably going to be easy to move your head that far back compared to where it is supposed to be normally.
Old and Busted: Open Carry
nah I'm not... more of a post apocalyptic velour smoking jacket fan.Has @nstassel posted anything here yet?
Given his current avatar,
he really ought to be the patron saint of the subforum...
great but looking at all the different models what does any of this mean?
Im sure she appreciates that.I just use it to get sluts naked
LP - Resolutiongreat but looking at all the different models what does any of this mean?
LP – 68
SNR – 31.64
EBI – 0.12
HALO – 0.82
FOM – 2152
Those are the numbers that rate the tube on the spec sheet. I have the L3 acceptance sheet, (ITAR protected so I am not going to post it heregreat but looking at all the different models what does any of this mean?
LP – 68
SNR – 31.64
EBI – 0.12
HALO – 0.82
FOM – 2152
Signal to Noise of 30+ isn’t bad.Those are the numbers that rate the tube on the spec sheet. I have the L3 acceptance sheet, (ITAR protected so I am not going to post it here) those numbers are all within the specs.
L3's minimum is 24.1.Signal to Noise of 30+ isn’t bad.
At least for antennas, so I’m told…
Im sure she appreciates that.