Ohio Division of Wildlife looks to increase out-of-staters' hunting, fishing license fees

HorizontalHunter

NES Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
12,094
Likes
17,202
Location
Western Massachusetts
Feedback: 5 / 0 / 0
Talk about a flat out money grab from nonresidents. How much is too much? Where do you draw the line?

Dave Golowenski
Special to the Columbus Dispatch

The Ohio Division of Wildlife is proposing hiking license fees for out-of-state hunters and fishers.


Money makes the world go ‘round, the song wryly assures a "Cabaret" audience.

The people who decide how much green is needed to keep the Ohio Division of Wildlife going ‘round figure $92.4 million won't be enough this year. The figure, which represents the division's 2024 budget, is probably insufficient in a future promising tariffs, supply-chain issues and inflation.

Expenses totaled $92.2 million in 2024, which in terms of a balance sheet, is cutting things pretty close. These days it's about the cost of a couple of store-bought eggs.

Pennies must be watched. Spending on personnel and projects, law enforcement and administration, education and land acquisition adds up, especially for a government agency that depends mostly on user fees to generate revenue and that can’t print money it doesn’t have to cover shortfalls.

To head off potential service shrinkages, the division has offered a plan to increase revenues by hiking the “price of most of our non-resident license fees,” wrote Kendra Wecker, the wildlife division chief, in a recent communication.

Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
And here’s a section of the statement that should perk up the ears of Ohio residents who purchase hunting and fishing licenses:

“These increases are projected to add between $4 million and $6 million of revenue annually to the wildlife fund, so we will not need to seek a resident fee increase for several years.”

Check out a rundown of what the division has in mind for non-residents:

• $74 for an annual fishing license, an increase from $49.

• $50 for a three-day license, more than double the current cost of $24.

• A doubling of the cost of a single-day fishing license, to $26 from the current $13.

• An almost tripling of the cost of an either-sex deer permit, to $210 from $74. A sizable increase in the cost of a hunting license and either-sex deer permit, to $399.36 from the current $257.92

The numbers, Wecker wrote, are in line with those collected in other Midwestern states.

Lake Erie, primarily because of its superior walleye fishing, has long been a destination for out-of-state anglers. Deer in Ohio are recognized as numerous and large, worth a trip from elsewhere, particularly nearby states.

During the recent deer season, hunters from Pennsylvania scooped up almost 8,000 non-resident licenses, while Michiganders bought about 5,200, West Virginians 3,625, North Carolinians nearly 3,300 and New Yorkers more than 3,000.

The proposed increases won’t become law until approved by the Ohio General Assembly as part of the biennial budget bill that typically doesn’t get firmed up until the deadline for passage arrives in late June.

The price changes won’t become effective until 90 days after the governor signs the budget, which means late September, Wecker wrote.

Hunting dates​

Pending likely approval by the eight-member Ohio Wildlife Council, the upcoming deer archery season will begin Sept. 27 and run through Feb. 1, 2026.

The wildlife division also proposed dates for the youth deer gun hunt (Nov. 22-23), deer gun season (Dec. 1-7 and Dec. 20-21), and muzzleloader season (Jan. 3 through Jan. 6, 2026).


 
What are the odds the supply of out-of-state sportsmen willing to pay the increased prices drops precipitously such that they actually bring in less revenue.
Asking for a friend.

That’s what happened in Connecticut 8ish years ago.
The non-resident archery license went from $100 to over $200. License sales plummeted and in the end they rolled it back to $130 where it sits today.

They killed the golden goose.

Ohio is still perceived as a great big buck state so many will pony up and pay it for now anyway . Time will tell.
 
Schemes like this always sound great on paper to those low level bureaucrats who never held a position of significance in the private sector and usually bounced from one public sector job to another. If they're only 1/2 retarded they hire a consultancy to determine where the equilibrium where people will still pay the fee, begrudgingly-so, but will create additional revenue. They usually drift into 3/4 retarded territory when they hire BCG and some kid straight out of B-school with a 2.7 GPA expertly tells them what the annual fee should be and and they're straight back to full-retarded when fees completely negate any additional revenue.
 
I guess they don't have any deer overpopulation problems. At least not now. What the future brings for Ohio is anyone's guess. I hope they don't run out of those big bucks attracting wealthy hunters. I suspect the fringe wealthy will balk at these prices.
 
What are the odds the supply of out-of-state sportsmen willing to pay the increased prices drops precipitously such that they actually bring in less revenue.
Asking for a friend.
Between high lease costs, high license costs, and travel and all that....Im amazed anyone travels out to the Midwest to hunt deer anymore.
Kansas, Iowa, Illinois and surrounding states are full retard on NR lease and licenses costs. These midwestern states are continually trying to one up each other on NR tag costs.

I can't wrap my head around paying thousands to kill a deer.......no matter what the antlers are. To each his own, but im not buying into it.

PA is a bargain compared to most states NR. Lots of deer, lots of state land and some of it very good.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top Bottom