Red Flag Gun Laws Set The Stage For Selective Disarmament Of Conservatives

I've had Pro-Trump, Pro-2A stickers on my Rav4 for years. After election was stolen I bought "TRUMP 2024" magnets for my vehicles and had 3 different incidents where stupid DB's pulled up to me and went ballistic. The last year I've had many more 👍 from Ma. motorists than 🖕. Dems are in panic mode, picked up grandkids yesterday and on the way home noticed a lawn sign that said, " Save Democracy, Vote Democrat". If I was living across the street I would design a lawn sign that said, "
Save Democracy, Defeat a Democrat". Got pulled over in Lancaster on 117 a few months ago for doing 45 in a 30 zone and Cop walked up to vehicle, told me he liked my stickers and laughed. Asked for license/reg and told me he'd have me on my way in 5 minutes
 
Watched Tucker last night, remember WE are the target because the Left deems us "extremists" because we don't support their Socialist agenda. WE must be silenced, controlled and disarmed for them to accomplish their mission. Failure is not an option for them.
Likewise, WE are the solution. The cavalry isn’t coming. WE must engineer the political will to turn this situation around, before it’s too late. WE must force our politicians, big business, etc. to care enough about self-preservation to act on our behalf. It’s ALL ABOUT POLITICAL WILL. He who has it, wins.
 
lol safest seat in government, what is the establishment gop gonna run someone against him?

There are people right here on NES who think that Mitch McConnell won't sell anyone down the river. McConnell stands for nothing except going to war somewhere. I seriously hope that this jerkoff is primaried and kicked out of office. But you know, McConnell will work hard to deny anyone but the establishment that seat in the senate.

It's either that or McConnell is planning on pulling some obscure rule rarely ever used to torpedo everything. I don't trust democrats because they get a little buy in, they know it's something that will pass and then the pile on starts.

I'm a republican and I hate republicans. They suck, completely. They do nothing, they fight for nothing, they represent nothing. They are nothing. The red wave is going to turn into a red trickle thanks to McConnell and the rest of the RINOs.
 
There are people right here on NES who think that Mitch McConnell won't sell anyone down the river. McConnell stands for nothing except going to war somewhere. I seriously hope that this jerkoff is primaried and kicked out of office. But you know, McConnell will work hard to deny anyone but the establishment that seat in the senate.

It's either that or McConnell is planning on pulling some obscure rule rarely ever used to torpedo everything. I don't trust democrats because they get a little buy in, they know it's something that will pass and then the pile on starts.

I'm a republican and I hate republicans. They suck, completely. They do nothing, they fight for nothing, they represent nothing. They are nothing. The red wave is going to turn into a red trickle thanks to McConnell and the rest of the RINOs.
McConnell controls the KY GOP. He won't be challenged. His hand-picked replacement will take his seat when he's ready to go.
 
McConnell controls the KY GOP. He won't be challenged. His hand-picked replacement will take his seat when he's ready to go.
Cocaine Mitch blocked Merritt Garland from the Supreme Court which set the stage for 3 Trump appointee's. Mitch is the consummate political animal/insider. The reason the Republican's either don't fully commit to the fight or are timid compared to the leftists is because they believe in the rules and the leftists don't. Leftists want to destroy America and have no reservations about burning it down to rebuild the country on their terms, which would be a quasi Socialist State controlled by them. They don't believe in the Constitution/Bill of Rights while the GOP wants to preserve the status quo. Republicans fight by the Queensbury Rules while the leftist's use MMA/slash and burn strategy.
 
Cocaine Mitch blocked Merritt Garland from the Supreme Court which set the stage for 3 Trump appointee's. Mitch is the consummate political animal/insider. The reason the Republican's either don't fully commit to the fight or are timid compared to the leftists is because they believe in the rules and the leftists don't. Leftists want to destroy America and have no reservations about burning it down to rebuild the country on their terms, which would be a quasi Socialist State controlled by them. They don't believe in the Constitution/Bill of Rights while the GOP wants to preserve the status quo. Republicans fight by the Queensbury Rules while the leftist's use MMA/slash and burn strategy.

Leftist political struggle: |---| gain a little ground
everyone else <---- lose a little ground.

Rinse and repeat a few dozen times and we'll end up fighting stupid details like "how much of ammo needs to be turned in" during a drag queen gun buyback hour and wondering how we got that way. If one side refuses to play by the rules and ram things down everyone's throats rules be damned, then where are we really? One or 2 steps away from drag queen gun buyback?

Leftists have been roping in their political opponents for decades and all McConnell represents is a small speed bump in progress for them. Today's lefist will actually agree with McConnell on issues like war and military spending and authoritarian rules. So where is McConnell in the political spectrum. You see a politician, I see a turtle hiding in his shell hoping no one sees him.

Merrick Garland in the end analysis means nothing. The only thing I'm happy for is that the dirty SOB never made it to the supreme court.
 
Garland is doing more damage now. Even more then he could do on the Court. He is totally unchecked on what he wants to do. The current government selectively leaves the left alone and let's them do as they please and only goes after the right.
 
  • This is the reply that I got from the Communist Slut, That Represents the Communist Party here in the New Hampshire Second Congressional District


    Fri, Jun 17 at 2:23 PM



    mail


    June 17, 2022

    Dear Mr. P


    Thank you for reaching out to me with your views regarding H.R. 8, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act, and H.R. 1446, the Enhanced Background Checks Act. Listening to my constituents is a fundamental part of my job as it helps me to best represent you and New Hampshire’s priorities in Congress.
    The tragedies in Uvalde, Buffalo, Newtown and far too many other communities make clear we must do more to keep our schools and communities safe. The rate of gun violence in the United States is 25 times higher than comparable countries around the world -- that is unacceptable. While no law or policy can eliminate violence in our country, that cannot be an excuse for inaction. Congress must act to improve access to mental health services and strengthen the enforcement of existing laws by requiring background checks for all gun sales, ending the sale of assault weapons, and keeping guns from high-risk individuals to keep our communities and families safe.
    Protecting Americans from gun violence should not be a partisan issue. New Hampshire has a proud tradition of safe, legal firearm ownership, and I am a firm supporter of the 2nd Amendment. I believe both parties can -- and must -- come together to pass legislation that will help save lives. As we work together in Congress to address this issue, I’ll bring to the table the voices of New Hampshire law enforcement officials, families, hunters and sportsmen, school administrators, first responders, mental health counselors, gun owners, and other stakeholders to discuss the best way to ensure the safety of our children and communities.
    Introduced by Rep. Mike Thompson (CA-05), the Bipartisan Background Checks Act requires background checks on all firearm sales. Introduced by Rep. James Clyburn (SC-06), the Enhanced Background Checks Act extends the amount of waiting time for a federal licensed firearm owner to complete a background check before transferring a firearm to an unlicensed individual. This would close the so-called "Charleston Loophole" which allowed an individual, who was ineligible to purchase a firearm due to previous criminal convictions, to purchase a firearm that was then used to murder nine worshippers at the Mother Emanuel church in Charleston, South Carolina. As a cosponsor to these bills, I believe that ensuring background checks are conducted for all firearms sales will help save lives and prevent future tragedies. I was pleased to vote for both these pieces of legislation when they passed the House on March 11, 2021 and urge their swift consideration in the Senate. Please know I will keep your thoughtful views in mind as Congress considers this and other legislation to reduce and eliminate gun violence in our country.
    Thank you again for sharing your thoughts with me. I strive to maintain an open dialogue with the people of New Hampshire about issues important to our district. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact my Concord office at (603) 226-1002 or my Washington, DC office at (202) 225-5206. I also encourage you to sign up for my e-newsletter at http://Kuster.house.gov/contact/newsletter, visit my website at U.S. Representative Ann McLane Kuster, follow me on Twitter at @RepAnnieKuster, or check out my Facebook page at Log into Facebook.

    Sincerely,
    mail

    Ann McLane Kuster
    Member of Congress​
 
This is my reply to the slut.

  • Ann McLane Kuster

Sat 6/18/2022 9:27 AM

Madame,
You will notice that I did not use the term "Honorable" as you have shown that are not worthy of such recognition.
I saw from your copy and paste letter that you are using the usual double talk to validate why you voted as directed by the "Party" so typical of you and your fellow "Communists". Yes, I said Communists as that is what your "Party" has become.
Based on results your "Party' Has become "The Communist Party USA"

You do not represent us here in New Hampshire. You can stop with that lie that you keep telling yourself.
You represent your party and do the bidding of your "Party Leaders".

I sincerely hope that come this November that you are replaced by someone that actually believes and follows the their "Oath of Office" that you have so willingly failed to do.
 
Garland is doing more damage now. Even more then he could do on the Court. He is totally unchecked on what he wants to do. The current government selectively leaves the left alone and let's them do as they please and only goes after the right.
Supreme Court is lifetime appointment, Garland will either be out after midterms or when the Dems lose in 2024.
 
However consider the unchecked damage he can reep in the short time he is in that office. The corruption in the justice system and FBI that he has direct responsibility for will have long term effect. At least on the court he would at least have opposition on dicessions.
 
Every divorce lawyer advises female clients to do this even if they have to make it all up. Leverage for extortion demands.

God's honest truth.
My sister's lawyer harped on her relentlessly to do it, and eventually she fired the bitch .

My ex wife's lawyer tried the same thing, she fired her after our first joint meeting. We found a mediator, worked up an agreement and had my lawyer write it up and file it.
 
Back
Top Bottom