What's everyone's experience with the LC9. Good or Bad?
I own an LCP but I will say I wasn't really expecting much from the LC9. Since then I have gotten the opportunity to shoot one of these twice and I must say I didn't think it was all that bad especially for the price. I I have probably shot 50-70 rounds through the gun or more without one single issue. The owner has shot a lot more than that through it without any problems. The trigger did take me a little getting used to but its very similar to the LCP.
Aside from all the safety features I'm sure people will complain about I didn't think it was horrible. I have had more problems with my Kahr's. At first I was worried the LCI stuck up so high that it would actually start to get in the way of the sight picture but it didn't. If it were mine i think i would file it down a little bit so it didn't stick up quite as far though. The other thing is the magazine safety disconnect. Personally I don't have a use for the feature. Some of my guns have them, some don't. They are what they are. I did watch a video on removing the mag safety disconnect and it's not that hard but whether or not to modify or remove safety features on a gun could be a whole other topic.
I don't think it would necessarily be a bad buy for the money seeing how you can get them for less than $400 out the door. I will say that again, "for the money" Sure there are other guns I like better but they cost considerably more. The guns I compare this to are other single stack 9mm's I have owned or shot like the PM9, PPS, P225/P6, G26 (even though it is a double stack). I would also throw the PF9 and Kimber Solo in the mix but I don't have any experience with those guns.
I own an LCP but I will say I wasn't really expecting much from the LC9. Since then I have gotten the opportunity to shoot one of these twice and I must say I didn't think it was all that bad especially for the price. I I have probably shot 50-70 rounds through the gun or more without one single issue. The owner has shot a lot more than that through it without any problems. The trigger did take me a little getting used to but its very similar to the LCP.
Aside from all the safety features I'm sure people will complain about I didn't think it was horrible. I have had more problems with my Kahr's. At first I was worried the LCI stuck up so high that it would actually start to get in the way of the sight picture but it didn't. If it were mine i think i would file it down a little bit so it didn't stick up quite as far though. The other thing is the magazine safety disconnect. Personally I don't have a use for the feature. Some of my guns have them, some don't. They are what they are. I did watch a video on removing the mag safety disconnect and it's not that hard but whether or not to modify or remove safety features on a gun could be a whole other topic.
I don't think it would necessarily be a bad buy for the money seeing how you can get them for less than $400 out the door. I will say that again, "for the money" Sure there are other guns I like better but they cost considerably more. The guns I compare this to are other single stack 9mm's I have owned or shot like the PM9, PPS, P225/P6, G26 (even though it is a double stack). I would also throw the PF9 and Kimber Solo in the mix but I don't have any experience with those guns.