![www.ammoland.com](https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/AP5-P-Core-Suppressed.jpg)
Vermont: Suppressor Hunting Bill Signed Into Law
Governor Phil Scott (R-VT) signed H. 878 into law, removing the two-year sunset provision from S. 281 that temporarily legalized the use of suppressors while hunting in Vermont.
![www.ammoland.com](https://www.ammoland.com/favicon-32x32.png)
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
They'd need to legalize them, can't hunt with what you can't own.Just wish some of this would brush off on Mass.
Just wish some of this would brush off on Mass.
Ma senators cannot in a good faith legalize any senator removal tools. Even a slight probability is too much when stakes are about safety of politicians.They'd need to legalize them, can't hunt with what you can't own.
In other words, CORRUPT MA. POLITICIANS ARE AFRAID OF BEING SHOT AT THEIR FRONT DOOR AND NOBODY HEARING THE SHOTS.Ma senators cannot in a good faith legalize any senator removal tools. Even a slight probability is too much when stakes are about safety of politicians.
No one specified it was for varmint huntingIn other words, CORRUPT MA. POLITICIANS ARE AFRAID OF BEING SHOT AT THEIR FRONT DOOR AND NOBODY HEARING THE SHOTS.
Then they should watch out for people approaching their doors with pillows in hands.In other words, CORRUPT MA. POLITICIANS ARE AFRAID OF BEING SHOT AT THEIR FRONT DOOR AND NOBODY HEARING THE SHOTS.
It's already legal to hunt with suppressors in MA; or put correctly, it is not illegal to hunt with suppressors. As you say, the issue is ownership. The only people who legally own and/or possess suppressors are 07 FFLs and LEOs. My night time coyote setup is a 300BLK AR pistol with a suppressor and thermal. 2/3 of the setup they will not let the average person possess. I am actually surprised they have not yet attacked night vision and thermal use...They'd need to legalize them, can't hunt with what you can't own.
Then we just need to show then that silencers really only muffle the report and are still able to be picked up by shot spotter.In other words, CORRUPT MA. POLITICIANS ARE AFRAID OF BEING SHOT AT THEIR FRONT DOOR AND NOBODY HEARING THE SHOTS.
Mass has been brushing off on VT, if you have paid attention to which direction VT has gone.Just wish some of this would brush off on Mass.
Because New York wasn’t good enough on its own.Mass has been brushing off on VT, if you have paid attention to which direction VT has gone.
I don't hunt, but I had thought there was a thing about Artificial Light with Coyotes. Which always seemed crazy, because off leash dogs exist. Was there an update or anything that differentiates Artificial Light as just flashlights and to not include Thermal and Night Vision?It's already legal to hunt with suppressors in MA; or put correctly, it is not illegal to hunt with suppressors. As you say, the issue is ownership. The only people who legally own and/or possess suppressors are 07 FFLs and LEOs. My night time coyote setup is a 300BLK AR pistol with a suppressor and thermal. 2/3 of the setup they will not let the average person possess. I am actually surprised they have not yet attacked night vision and thermal use...
Thermal is not artificial light, but receiving a different wave length. NV is the same and fine as long as you don’t have a flashlight.I don't hunt, but I had thought there was a thing about Artificial Light with Coyotes. Which always seemed crazy, because off leash dogs exist. Was there an update or anything that differentiates Artificial Light as just flashlights and to not include Thermal and Night Vision?
You forgot they have Bernie Sanders as a Senator. Except we have no claim to fame with Granny Warren.That's great, but Vermont sucks in other ways, 3 day waiting period, mag limits, higher tax burden than NH or even MA, and it's full of pot smoking earthy crunchy hippies, but otherwise Vermont is nice.
I am actually surprised they have not yet attacked night vision and thermal use...
Tell me more. I've got what seems like a good opportunity to retire there. Am I making a mistake?That's great, but Vermont sucks in other ways, 3 day waiting period, mag limits, higher tax burden than NH or even MA, and it's full of pot smoking earthy crunchy hippies, but otherwise Vermont is nice.
If you are anywhere but Burlington, there is a serious lack of good restaurants and shops. And you don't want to be in Burlington. Literally everything you want to do or go to will be an hour away, no matter where in the state you live. Fishing and hunting are good, but don't expect to grow much of a garden if you want. Everything above southern VT is in zone 4 a or b, which is basically Anchorage, Alaska. Super short growing season. Learn how to do everything yourself, there is a massive shortage of tradespeople, and the ones we have are so busy they don't call you back unless it's for a very large job. You will quickly grow to hate leaf peepers. The taxes are catastrophic and set to be raised again. And don't worry about that mag limit, it's pretty unenforceable the way it's written, and only comes in to play when someone doesn't like you. Car inspections are like $80 a year and pretty tough. I don't know if it's a mistake, but I would have done it differently.Tell me more. I've got what seems like a good opportunity to retire there. Am I making a mistake?
Yeah, obviously I was referencing John Q Public not just government licensed/employed folks though.It's already legal to hunt with suppressors in MA; or put correctly, it is not illegal to hunt with suppressors. As you say, the issue is ownership. The only people who legally own and/or possess suppressors are 07 FFLs and LEOs. My night time coyote setup is a 300BLK AR pistol with a suppressor and thermal. 2/3 of the setup they will not let the average person possess. I am actually surprised they have not yet attacked night vision and thermal use...