So I'm starting to plan out some IDPA-style multigun stages for side-matches next year, and I'm having a little trouble with shotguns. I haven't spent alot of time shooting shotguns for any reason, and I'm having a difficult time coming up with shots or stages that I'd rather do with a shotgun than a rifle. I've watched alot of shotgun 3-gun videos, and it seems like mostly everyone has people using shotguns for shots that would be much nicer with a rifle.
The only thing I can come up with is that Texas Stars and other similar small moving targets seem like they're suited to the shotgun, but access to small moving targets in an action-shooting stage is limited.
Similarly, I think the more basic issue is that I'm not sure what the shotgun's role in modern self-defense really is. It doesn't seem to have radically better ballistics than a rifle (external or terminal), is slower, has greater recoil, has a lower range with shot and over-penetration issues with slugs. It seems like the cost of a good shotgun is lower, but get into fancy tactical shotguns (which look cool) or fancy competition shotguns and this advantage goes away quick.
So, help me out. Besides the fact that competition requires one, why do I need a shotgun?
The only thing I can come up with is that Texas Stars and other similar small moving targets seem like they're suited to the shotgun, but access to small moving targets in an action-shooting stage is limited.
Similarly, I think the more basic issue is that I'm not sure what the shotgun's role in modern self-defense really is. It doesn't seem to have radically better ballistics than a rifle (external or terminal), is slower, has greater recoil, has a lower range with shot and over-penetration issues with slugs. It seems like the cost of a good shotgun is lower, but get into fancy tactical shotguns (which look cool) or fancy competition shotguns and this advantage goes away quick.
So, help me out. Besides the fact that competition requires one, why do I need a shotgun?