That is true, but what if I decide to sell the gun at some point, the way it reads could be taken as I'm the handgun-purveyor. yes / no ?
No. Once again, you are commenting on these legal issues and yet you appear to have made no effort to research what you are talking about. We already sent you a link to the regulations and suggested that you go read them. It appears that you did not, because this question is answered in the regulations.
The regulations define the term "handgun-purveyor". Oddly enough, you can find this definition in the section of the regulations entitled "Definitions."
Handgun-purveyor: shall mean any person or entity that transfers handguns to a customer located within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. However, handgun-purveyor shall not include any of the aforementioned if:
(a) the person or entity transfers less than five handguns per year,
Full text is here:
http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=cagoter...lations_940CMR16&csid=Cago#16.01: Definitions
You're not a handgun-purveyor, even if you sell your handgun.
That is true and as I stated that was what was told to me by a lawyer.
That is an opinion that has been (and will continue to be) hotly debated. Unless you tell us who that lawyer was and exactly what he said, then you aren't going to convince anyone.
Lawyers are like doctors; they specialize. The guy who wrote your will may be outstanding when it comes to handling family financial matters, but he may know next to nothing about MA gun laws and have zero experience in self defense cases. As a result, his opinion may be no more knowledgeable than anyone else's, yet you expect us to take his opinion as a truth. Why, exactly?
You claim to have spoken to "many gun lawyers." Exactly who are these gun lawyers and what did they say? I know Cross-X. I've exchanged e-mail with Scrivener. These are two of the more highly-regarded firearms attorneys in MA. I seriously doubt your post was an accurate portrayal of any advice Cross-X or Scrivener would have given you.
There aren't "many gun lawyers" in MA. I am aware of 4. Of those, I would trust the advice of two, the third I don't know but he has a good reputation, and the fourth is not someone I would trust. Since there aren't "many gun lawyers" in MA, I have a hard time believing that you "talked...with many gun lawyers." I have to believe that you were, at best, exaggerating your claims. Or at worst, you were deliberately misleading others to make your post appear more authoritative.
That was uncalled for, I have in all these posts never put someone down, I have posted what was told to me by people that I talked to that are in posistions that you would think they know what they are saying.
Perhaps you're finally learning something here. Many folks, yourself included, speak as though they know what they are talking about, when in fact they have no clue. And this often includes people you might think would know what they are saying. Many gun dealers are not that familiar with the law. Many police officers (including licensing officers) are not that familiar with firearms law. Trust them at your peril when it comes to MA laws. And if you come here and post that "X is true because a gun dealer told me so," don't be surprised if you get smacked around here (after we stop laughing). If you've been around gun shops for a while, you'll find that you hear some whoppers spoken from both sides of the counter. For example, a fellow in this forum was told the following in a gun shop:
That was my impression as well, funny, someone tending a gun shop the otherday said they can't legally downgrade you unless something has changed on your record between renewals. I said that doesn't sound right, he said "trust me, I teach the law twice a week".
Now that is freakin' hilarious.
This forum uses't to be fun to come to, this forum uses't to try and help people. All I see now are the high post count people being unkind to others. Not everyone knows everything and I though that was the idea of this forum in the 1st place. To have a fun place to come to with friendly people who where willing to help out our other shooting brothers and sisters.
Having fun is great. But when you post incorrect information about gun laws in an authoritative fashion then you can expect to get challenged. This is particularly true when you can not support your argument by referencing the appropriate statutes and regulations, which are available online. And when you were challenged, you got all defensive and angry about it. You were pointed towards the regulations in question, and yet it appears that you still have not read them.
When commenting on the law, you should be very careful to distinguish between what you believe to be illegal and what may, in your opinion, expose someone to increased risk. For example, if you are in MA and are not a police officer or in the military, possessing a post-ban, large capacity magazine is against the law. That is illegal.
In contrast, some folks would argue that using your own reloads for self defense might expose you to added risk in the event of a self-defense shooting. The theory being that the prosecutor could try to portray you in a bad light to the jury, saying something along the lines that "regular ammunition wasn't deadly enough for Mr. DavidC77, so he spent hours in his basement, hand-crafting specially deadly rounds, one at a time, yadda, yadda, yadda." This is clearly in the realm of opinion. It isn't illegal to use reloads for self defense. There are those who agree with this opinion (e.g., Ayoob) and there are those who don't.
But your post, when you said:
The big thing that no one has said is if you change your trigger and mag. disconect you no longer have a legal Mass gun!!!
made no distinction between the two.
If you post here about legal issues, then you better know what you are talking about. If not, you will be quickly and mercilessly corrected. Heck, you never even got Scrivened!