LTCRN
NES Member
Some have ego's that are inflated larger than the Hindenburg! I expect those are the one's that issue restrictions or soon to be the one's that pout about losing some of their control regarding firearms restrictions.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Supreme Court - NYSRPA v. Bruen - Megathread
- Thread starter soloman02
- Start date
AHM
NES Member
You write that like the police GAF if he becomes a victim between now and then.
They release in some sort of seniority order among the justices.
(For the whole end-of-session queue?)
If I heard that,
I'ma light out for 619DW up in MerryMag like a scalded cat...
Can you imagine the new phone tree?
You have reached Comm2A.
We're sorry all of our lines are busy.
If you want to get a suitability denial reversed, press "1#".
If you want to get restrictions lifted, press "2#".
If you want to buy large cap mags, press "3#".
If you want to buy a Glerk, press "19#".
If you want to buy an AR, press "15#".
...
MainelyFree
NES Member
pdm
NES Member
By praying we get to SCOTUS and hoping they finally take a case? Heh. No, I mean like a gun dealer sues an AG in federal court and the AG bends the knee, like the lefties do with voting and such.
LA Times is a cesspool of racism
www.latimes.com
Column: Is California ready for more Black people to legally carry guns in public?
The Supreme Court says the 2nd Amendment covers the right to carry guns in public. But for Black people, the calculation has always been more complicated.
www.latimes.com
He'll there's websites also you can get them, but that's a more instantaneous fullfillment
I hear they'll be releasing a WHOLE bunch of really important stuff on Monday. NEXT Monday.
/s
SteelShooter
NES Member
I heard 2 weeks.....
There are posts on this in this thread. They need to address the 4 cases pending cert at SCOTUS
View: https://twitter.com/gunpoliticsny/status/1541075212162277384?s=20&t=pFq0fjmCEcPtPVb-2nd7JA
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
- Messages
- 142
- Likes
- 256
anything happen?
Roadglide
NES Member
Oh I know they didn’t in the past and probably still don’t now. My point is in light of everything that has transpired recently if god forbid something like I mentioned were to happen now, well with the possibility of a mountain sized shit slide that would start at the top of local government and roll on top of the pd at the bottom of the hill……..you can fill in the rest.
Roadglide
NES Member
Not today
On the day the opinion is issued, they use reverse seniority of the author of the opinion. So any opinion authored by Barrett would be the first released on that day, then Kavanaugh, Gorsuch…..
I don’t know of any reason why opinions are released at a certain time other than it’s ready. The more controversial opinions seem to always be released at the end of a term. Some of that is probably related to there being a lot more debate and bedside to have the opinion say certain things.
No. No mention of any of those cases.
Attleboro, Seekonk and Norton toeing the line. I thought Attleboro was more green than this...
Some Attleboro area police chiefs see little change on gun licenses, await state guidance
Some Attleboro area police chiefs say there are no immediate changes in how they issue gun licenses and that they are awaiting for state guidelines on the legal ramifications ofwww.thesunchronicle.com
Norton Police Chief Brian Clark agrees and does not see any major changes.
“Massachusetts has had pretty strict gun laws for quite a while. We’re considered the model for the rest of the country,” Clark said.
Ha ha ha. No it’s not.
pastera
NES Member
While the NFA should fall these are the cases to get the fastest smackdown
Farmer v. Higgins
United States v. Rock Island Armory
UNITED STATES v. WARNER
Warner is interesting given how the silencer possession was an acquittal (not certain about the particulars) but the court found for his argument for leniency based on modifying for full auto as a hobby interest.
Point 32 in the link: "No class of private persons, whether denominated by hobby or employment, is excused from that prohibition."
This point seems factually incorrect as the employment of FFL manufacturer with SOT does allow exclusion from the prohibition.
Farmer v. Higgins
United States v. Rock Island Armory
UNITED STATES v. WARNER
Warner is interesting given how the silencer possession was an acquittal (not certain about the particulars) but the court found for his argument for leniency based on modifying for full auto as a hobby interest.
Point 32 in the link: "No class of private persons, whether denominated by hobby or employment, is excused from that prohibition."
This point seems factually incorrect as the employment of FFL manufacturer with SOT does allow exclusion from the prohibition.
safetyfirst2125
NES Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2020
- Messages
- 15,576
- Likes
- 40,182
pastera
NES Member
Question for Rhodies - Who is studying an injunction against the new restrictions set to go into place?
This seems like a very ripe subject given the number of people and the timeline.
This seems like a very ripe subject given the number of people and the timeline.
pdm
NES Member
In MA, it's probably better to get a couple of these AWB/mag ban other cases settled using the new standard, and then use them as precedent to argue in 1st Cir. Especially in less 2A-friendly circuits. But that might just be my optimism.
pastera
NES Member
Given the short fuse the SCOTUS may be ripe to offer a per curiam like Caetano since the law is easily outside the bounds of Bruen.
If the 1st wants to offer up its usual tripe and have everyone's mag bans nullified then everyone wins. If they knuckle under to allow other circuits to keep bans we still win
Glocklike tendencies
NES Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2019
- Messages
- 392
- Likes
- 746
you are so right, it really is NOT the model, 43 states are shall issue says the court!! MA may be the model for 6??? sorry Brian Clark
SteelShooter
NES Member
hmmm. Let's hope they do the right thing.... for once
cathouse01
NES Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2018
- Messages
- 2,441
- Likes
- 4,668
LA Times is a cesspool of racism
Column: Is California ready for more Black people to legally carry guns in public?
The Supreme Court says the 2nd Amendment covers the right to carry guns in public. But for Black people, the calculation has always been more complicated.
From National Review:
gun-control-is-racist-black-gun-owners-celebrate-supreme-court-striking-down-n-y-concealed-carry-restriction
AHM
NES Member
Not once VTEC kicks in on the Everett...
Thanks much; that's exactly the bum steer I was thinking of
but didn't have the energy to look up.
Well in these cases, it's probably not because they want to
stir things up during peak riot season.
pastera
NES Member
Hard one - would rather see the whole thing get crushed but would like to get some mags before things go out of stock for months
10 round magazine limit is already being challenged in RI.
Gun shop, firearms owners challenge RI's new high-capacity magazine ban in court
Last edited:
pastera
NES Member
Replying to my own post after some searching
Rhode Island’s New Gun Control Measures May Not Survive Constitutional Challenges
For now—especially in light of the Bruen decision—the arguments being offered for these laws are far from impressive.
legalinsurrection.com
Challenge is already filed - hopefully they can quickly update the filing to include Bruen which should shut it down immediately.
So, mostly for fun, I dropped a dime on Maura with Rachel Rollins' office. You can submit a criminal complaint here. I figure I pay taxes to fund the US Attorney; might as well use her.
I wrote the following:
"Pursuant to the Bruen ruling that invalidates discretionary firearms licensure schemes in NY and seven other states (including Massachusetts), the state AG's office must change its licensing regulations. They have chosen not to comply, despite having had four days to do so. Indeed, the AG's office has made an explicit statement that their policies will not change.
"I'm curious how long the Supreme Court, through your office, intends to tolerate their insolence. Thank you!"
ETA: Oops. Shoulda said "six other states."
Oh well.
I wrote the following:
"Pursuant to the Bruen ruling that invalidates discretionary firearms licensure schemes in NY and seven other states (including Massachusetts), the state AG's office must change its licensing regulations. They have chosen not to comply, despite having had four days to do so. Indeed, the AG's office has made an explicit statement that their policies will not change.
"I'm curious how long the Supreme Court, through your office, intends to tolerate their insolence. Thank you!"
ETA: Oops. Shoulda said "six other states."
Oh well.
Last edited:
How unhappy do u think owners of machine guns will feel if the NFA is struck down? Those are losses in the 5 digits...
