If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
I assume this is tongue-in-cheek, as simply putting a round though the "cabin wall" won't depressurize a plane. This was often the argument by uneducated anti's against arming pilots, with scenarios that seemed to imagine the pressure hull of an airline was a giant balloon, waiting to burst.imagine if the round ruptured the cabin wall & the plane depressurized !
I assume this is tongue-in-cheek, as simply putting a round though the "cabin wall" won't depressurize a plane. This was often the argument by uneducated anti's against arming pilots, with scenarios that seemed to imagine the pressure hull of an airline was a giant balloon, waiting to burst.
I assume this is tongue-in-cheek, as simply putting a round though the "cabin wall" won't depressurize a plane. This was often the argument by uneducated anti's against arming pilots, with scenarios that seemed to imagine the pressure hull of an airline was a giant balloon, waiting to burst.
I assume this is tongue-in-cheek, as simply putting a round though the "cabin wall" won't depressurize a plane.
Without a doubt it was a frangible round designed for aviation use. No way would it penetrate an aircrafts hull.
Still it happens ... oh well
I would not be surprised if this was the result of transitioning from "in the box" to "on the belt."
Mythbusters actually pressurized a plane and then shot a round off through the side to prove the point. Nothing happened. The plane didn't depressurize until they blew out a window with explosives. And nothing hugely dramatic happened until they blew up a huge chunk of the plane with a large bomb sized amount of explosives.
What's the Vegas line on whether or not it was a GLock?
You can see that the tax payers money went into good use in training, cabin shooting 101 that must of been a great class.
The FFDO issue gun is a H&K USP Compact .40 with LEM trigger.
Word is the firearm discharged when a trigger lock was being put on the gun. Those Safe T Bloc locks http://members.aol.com/saftblok/ are fine to put on a loaded gun, but fiddling with the usual trigger locks will get a ND sooner than later.
http://johnrlott.blogspot.com/
They are required to store them in a lock box on the flight deck. First I heard of a trigger lock.
I have to ask the next time I see my friend. He's always shooting his Sig and I was under the assumption that this was his firearm used while operating under the FFDO standards. In fact I wasn't aware he was actually issued anything.
Mythbusters actually pressurized a plane and then shot a round off through the side to prove the point. Nothing happened. The plane didn't depressurize until they blew out a window with explosives. And nothing hugely dramatic happened until they blew up a huge chunk of the plane with a large bomb sized amount of explosives.
In general.—The Secretary shall authorize a Federal flight deck officer to carry a firearm on the officer’s person. Notwithstanding subsection (c)(1), the officer may purchase a firearm and carry that firearm in accordance with this section if the firearm is of a type that may be used under the program.
I am NOT trying to be an annoying nit picker here; I just felt that you might want to know:
On the Mythbusters show, the plane DID depressurize when the round penetrated the window. The myth was NOT if the plane would depressurize…. It WILL. The myth was that the plane would experience “explosive depressurization”. There is a big difference. When a plane depressurizes, the cabin pressure simply becomes equal to the exterior air pressure. In explosive depressurization, the airplane disassembles during equalization.
/John
Dude, you simply quoted the underlying bill authorizing the FFDO program (HR4126), not the agency regs. Note is says "...if the firearm is of a type that may be used under the program." It doesn't list the "type thay may be used," it just says you can also purchase and carry a non-issue weapon if it's the "type that may be used." The current issue FFDO weapon is the H&K Compact USP40 LEM.From the Federal regs....
H&K is just putting out a special deal for FFDO at a good rate but the H&K isn't mandated for use in the program.
A statement from TSA said the airplane was never in danger, and the TSA and the Federal Air Marshals Service are investigating the incident.
So rounds flying around a cockpit didn't place the plane in danger, but I have to pay $100.00 a minute to use a "specially shielded" Airphone rather than my cellphone in flight. Right..........