- Joined
- Oct 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,615
- Likes
- 1,891
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
At my age, the one on the left gets stretchmarks, cellulite, fat, and the twins hanging below the belly button. The one on the right stays pretty much the same....
40 is superior in every way. 10 is just a roided cousin that hangs around flexing muscle at parties, while the 40 goes home with all the ladies.I mean, the .40/10 dynamic is unparalleled among the autoloading pistol world. Want more power? 10mm. Want lower recoil? .40. Want a smaller pistol? .40. Want a bigger pistol? 10mm. Want a cheaper, more available ammo? .40. Want something to make fat Boomers feel antiquated and like they've outlived their usefulness? 10mm.
If we're going full retard lets add auto glass. 45 bounces off a lot of windshields!!!!! Brrrt zomg!!LOL, yep.
Mostly I want to point out that just like hunting, I wouldn't expect to have an optimum, full frontal torso shot with clearly visible 'lights out' zones to shoot. Target might look more like this, though instead of spraying graffiti on the wall he'd be spraying bullets in your direction.
Except for head and neck, vitals might be covered by an arm and shoulder. Something with more juice than 9mm might be a good idea?
If we're going full retard lets add auto glass. 45 bounces off a lot of windshields!!!!! Brrrt zomg!!
Intermediate barrier tantric disco! How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
View: https://youtu.be/CmWMZvmtCYo?si=AYfMoPenDBck2kww
And on the 8th day..... god heard this. And then god gave us.. the 357 Sig!!!
View: https://youtu.be/Wdo4Eyw4DqM?si=4QvUPnk4fiB1XOON
View attachment 852000
If we could buy the NATO loadings of 5.7 you may be onto something.Thread title is "Hashed to Death".
So .357 Sig is the preferred caliber for auto glass penetration?
So if the higher velocity of the 9mm makes it better than the heavier and slower 45 ACP, by that logic the FN 5.7 beats them all. (mic drop...)
I don't think anyone has said it is "better" in terms of terminal performance. Just that the difference is negligible.Thread title is "Hashed to Death".
So .357 Sig is the preferred caliber for auto glass penetration?
So if the higher velocity of the 9mm makes it better than the heavier and slower 45 ACP, by that logic the FN 5.7 beats them all. (mic drop...)
Thread title is "Hashed to Death".
So .357 Sig is the preferred caliber for auto glass penetration?
So if the higher velocity of the 9mm makes it better than the heavier and slower 45 ACP, by that logic the FN 5.7 beats them all. (mic drop...)
5.7 is definitely the answer to a question that I've never had.If we could buy the NATO loadings of 5.7 you may be onto something.
I think it has some valid military use. It's still niche but so is the majority of other shit in gun land5.7 is definitely the answer to a question that I've never had.