I had an interesting conversation with some folks at the range this weekend. One of them swore that Colt 1911's were the worst on the market, saying they had some major defects and recalls as of recent. The other had a Tarus and loved his, he said he had no problems. However, he does not shoot it often, so his mileage may vary. I have to admit that I am surprised by hearing bad things about Colt...
Kimber and S&W still sound like the best choices I have heard so far.. I have yet to hear anything bad about them (except maybe price, but you get what you pay for).
Opinions on Colt seem to be divided. Some say they are the end-all-be-all of 1911 manufacturing, another group says they are awesome, but much like buying a classic car - you'll need to tinker to get it running just right, and the last group thinks they are over priced crap. Obviously, there are some people who fall in between, but these seem to be the major consensi
From what I've gleaned on Taurus...there are a number of people who own them and really like them, and fine them very reliable. However, when someone gets one that fails, it tends to fail in a major way.
It is interesting the number of S&W 1911 fans on this site. I know it is partially due to the fact that it is essentially the best 1911 available new in MA, but there is a major difference in the number of people who like them here vs other major gun forums. Biggest complaint seems to be the external extractor, and, at least in the case of S&W, this seems to be mostly hate-on-principle. Yes, I'm aware that there are failure issues with external extractors, but some companies (from what I read on the internet
) seem to just get them right.
The first 1911 I ever shot, and the one that gave me the bug, was a Springfield Armory GI. I now own, as of this weekend, a Mil-Spec version, and am really hankering for a range trip
. They do tend to use MIM parts in their lower end models, but they, by all accounts, are quality MIM molds that aren't cheap crap like much other MIM stuff. SA makes a good base model 1911, and has different packages for different price points. Most accounts point to good customer service and an awesome custom shop.
Kimber gets pretty good reviews, and fill about the same quality niche as the S&W guns. I don't know much more about them. I've fired one, I'm not sure what kind. They tend to be equipped stock with a lot of the custom parts that many people add, anyway.
People love to hate Para, but once you dig through the hate-piles it seems there is less hate for their single action 1911s, and a lot of people really enjoy them. I've fired their commander sized alloy model (LTC PXT?), which rapidly changed my mind away from the revolvers I was looking at back to 1911s. It was a rental gun, and still seemed pretty accurate, and I had no problems with el-cheapo ammunition. There are a number of complaints that the power extractor they put on these dent casings, so if you reload it might be a bad idea to get one.
Norinco is generally spoken well of for the price point (cheap). I know nothing else about these.
Reviews of the Kahr built Auto Ordnance guns are generally good. If you're looking for a cheap base gun or some nostalgic GI styling, this is probably a good option, especially in MA. General consensus is stay away form the West Hurley AO guns...but again, many people seem to be fine with theirs.
Outside of MA, people looking for a cheap-yet-reliable 1911 seem to go for Rock Island Armory. Made in the phillipines, which turns some people off, but they seem to be quality built, and can be had for peanuts in 1911 money. Another good base gun or someone with a 1911 itch that needs to be scratched.
Those seem to be the common ones..it really all depends on what you are looking for in price, add-ons (sites, grips, bobtail, etc), quality, name, resale value, what state you live in, etc etc etc...the great thing about 1911s is there are so many types to choose from, and so many simple customizations to set yours apart.