White House Presidential Action: Protecting Second Amendment Rights (2/7/25)

Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Messages
289
Likes
398
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Protecting Second Amendment Rights

Protecting Second Amendment Rights​

EXECUTIVE ORDER
February 7, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. The Second Amendment is an indispensable safeguard of security and liberty. It has preserved the right of the American people to protect ourselves, our families, and our freedoms since the founding of our great Nation. Because it is foundational to maintaining all other rights held by Americans, the right to keep and bear arms must not be infringed.

Sec. 2. Plan of Action. (a) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General shall examine all orders, regulations, guidance, plans, international agreements, and other actions of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to assess any ongoing infringements of the Second Amendment rights of our citizens, and present a proposed plan of action to the President, through the Domestic Policy Advisor, to protect the Second Amendment rights of all Americans.
(b) In developing such proposed plan of action, the Attorney General shall review, at a minimum:
(i) All Presidential and agencies’ actions from January 2021 through January 2025 that purport to promote safety but may have impinged on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens;
(ii) Rules promulgated by the Department of Justice, including by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, from January 2021 through January 2025 pertaining to firearms and/or Federal firearms licensees;
(iii) Agencies’ plans, orders, and actions regarding the so-called “enhanced regulatory enforcement policy” pertaining to firearms and/or Federal firearms licensees;
(iv) Reports and related documents issued by the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention;
(v) The positions taken by the United States in any and all ongoing and potential litigation that affects or could affect the ability of Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights;
(vi) Agencies’ classifications of firearms and ammunition; and
(vii) The processing of applications to make, manufacture, transfer, or export firearms.

Sec. 3. Implementation. Upon submission of the proposed plan of action described in section 2 of this order, the Attorney General shall work with the Domestic Policy Advisor to finalize the plan of action and establish a process for implementation.

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
 
We'll see how this plays out. No news on Snope today. Bondi is also pro Red-flag and has a reputation for being nowhere near what we consider pro-2A. This could backfire.
Bondi is a long standing Trump supporter and trusted confidant. As such she will act with the Trumps administrations agenda.
 
Well that's not very comforting....

Exhibit A: "take the guns first...."

Exhibit B: bump stock ban
I hope we remain focused on the real agenda that the United States is on the verge of being taken over by Leftists. Nothing is even a close second. Had Hillary won in 2016 your 2A rights would already be gone by now.
 
I love how even with him writing an EO he’s still “anti gun”
He’s done more for 2A writing this EO than ANY OTHER POLITICIAN HAS, EVER

Guy could be giving away Fleming auto sears and guys on here would find a reason to complain 🤣
But it's like the responses to the USAID revelations on TwitterX - billions of dollars absconded or going to nefarious things, and it's "but but but the STARVING CHILDREN!!1!"

Yeah, the starving children aren't seeing one red cent of that money.

And even if they were, there comes a point when you have to go all Sam Kinison.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0LUdqFJEPI
 
I love how even with him writing an EO he’s still “anti gun”
He’s done more for 2A writing this EO than ANY OTHER POLITICIAN HAS, EVER

Guy could be giving away Fleming auto sears and guys on here would find a reason to complain 🤣

It's what NES'ers do !! Go back and find the MENSA thread !!! [rofl]
 
But it's like the responses to the USAID revelations on TwitterX - billions of dollars absconded or going to nefarious things, and it's "but but but the STARVING CHILDREN!!1!"

Yeah, the starving children aren't seeing one red cent of that money.

And even if they were, there comes a point when you have to go all Sam Kinison.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0LUdqFJEPI

The wife and I saw Sam at Mansfield in 1988. He was great but you could tell substance abuse was starting to take its toll.
 
I love how even with him writing an EO he’s still “anti gun”
He’s done more for 2A writing this EO than ANY OTHER POLITICIAN HAS, EVER

Guy could be giving away Fleming auto sears and guys on here would find a reason to complain 🤣
Yep, its the same all over the place on multiple gun forums where this has been posted. Trump finally does something that is slightly pro 2A and the dog pilling on Trump being anti 2A gets spewed. Or they dog pile Trump for not going far enough in gutting or ending the ATF. Or dog pile Trump for not going after NFA and allowing machine guns and silencers for all. :rolleyes: Gees people, take the minor win for once. For some their TDS just cannot be suppressed.

There is the potential for this EO to open the door in changing ATF. Could be bonus points if DOGE takes a scythe to ATF. We're only 20 days into Trump's presidency.
 
Means nothing for now.

If Bondi comes back recommending more Red Flag laws and AW bans we’ll know for sure she’s eGOP.
 
We'll see how this plays out. No news on Snope today. Bondi is also pro Red-flag and has a reputation for being nowhere near what we consider pro-2A. This could backfire.
Red flag laws are a very big problem, if what I have been hearing around here and elsewhere is true. People could easily lose their guns, maybe their careers and depending on the cops who show up to their house, their lives because someone they know wanted revenge on them for something petty and decided to red flag them.
 
I love how even with him writing an EO he’s still “anti gun”
He’s done more for 2A writing this EO than ANY OTHER POLITICIAN HAS, EVER

Guy could be giving away Fleming auto sears and guys on here would find a reason to complain 🤣
“Muh bUmP sChToSCHKS!!!”

Trump didn’t ban bump stocks because of some assault weapon BS, he did it because they are gay. I hope he also bans arm braces, pistol red dots and anything in .40 next. Also any sex toys that are colored pink or black.
 
Last edited:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bwMm2byYUU

We've been waiting a whole 3 weeks for tis, but we finally have some Executive action on gun rights as President Trump has issue an executive order effectrive February 7, 2025. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, the details of the order and what it directs the Attorney General to do. Does is solve any of our problems today? No. Does it have the potential to do quite a bit, yes it does. And most importantly, it will give us a very deep look into Pam Bondi and how much of a 2A advocate she truly is. So learn more today and arm yourself with education.
 

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bwMm2byYUU

We've been waiting a whole 3 weeks for tis, but we finally have some Executive action on gun rights as President Trump has issue an executive order effectrive February 7, 2025. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, the details of the order and what it directs the Attorney General to do. Does is solve any of our problems today? No. Does it have the potential to do quite a bit, yes it does. And most importantly, it will give us a very deep look into Pam Bondi and how much of a 2A advocate she truly is. So learn more today and arm yourself with education.

It also entices Roberts to say "eh we don't need to take Snopes since Trump is already handling it. Cert denied". Gives Roberts an easy way out too. f***er.
 
It also entices Roberts to say "eh we don't need to take Snopes since Trump is already handling it. Cert denied". Gives Roberts an easy way out too. f***er.
Snope is state law, not federal. The EO covers federal executive departments and agencies (like ATF). Now if Congress passed a law, and Trump signed it, that somehow struck down state AWB's, then I could see Roberts dumping Snope saying Trump is already handling it. But even then such a fed law would be challenged by gun hating blue states and the issue would eventually wind up before SCOTUS anyway.

The larger issue with Snope, and something this EO will not address, is the courts themselves (in addition to various state legislatures) who are the one's disregarding Heller, Chicago, Caetano, Bruen, and Rahimi. It is the courts who continue to use methods of scrutiny and lines of reasoning to achieve their desire to uphold the various gun bans in blue states. Those levels of scrutiny and lines of reason were specifically rejected in Bruen. Some courts, like the 4th in the already GVR'd Snope case, gave SCOTUS a huge middle finger and is daring SCOTUS to "do something about it". It remains to be seen if SCOTUS will actually respond and do something about it either this year or the next, or if they kick the can a decade down the road.
 
Last edited:
I love how even with him writing an EO he’s still “anti gun”
He’s done more for 2A writing this EO than ANY OTHER POLITICIAN HAS, EVER

Guy could be giving away Fleming auto sears and guys on here would find a reason to complain 🤣
How do you figure?

He literally signed (not wrote) an EO that asked his AG to "look into" 2a stuff.
So that AG, Bondi, the same AG who after parkland banned gun sales to people younger than 21 and enacted a red flag law, allowing law enforcement to petition a judge to temporarily confiscate the guns of someone deemed to be a threat to themselves or someone else, and defended FL's laws prohibiting open carry is going to "look into" the current laws for you and make it better?

So, I'm clear the president who:
A) Believes in taking guns first, due process second
B) Told the ATF that bump stocks will be a machine gun even though they'd decided multiple times before him they weren't
C) Signed a bill that ended the dickey amendment allowing the US government to research what rights they can limit (aka "study gun violence")
D) Went on record via twitter about 3d printed firearms- "I am looking into 3-D Plastic Guns being sold to the public. Already spoke to NRA, doesn’t seem to make much sense!", Sarah Hukabee later would comment that the DOJ settled on the matter (relating to the Defense distributed case) without the president's approval. The case ended in DD's favor, meaning that Trump was not for it- an anti-gun and anti-1a stance.

The only people who think Trump is pro-2a are sipping the kool-aid. He's not pro 2a, he just throws the 2a a bone once in a while to not alienate a voter base.

I'm sure someone's going to bring up SCOTUS- lets be clear on that: The only thing his justices have done of significance is repeal Row v Wade, scotus hasn't done squat for gun owners since Bruen.
 
He literally signed (not wrote) an EO that asked his AG to "look into" 2a stuff.
So that AG, Bondi, the same AG who after parkland banned gun sales to people younger than 21 and enacted a red flag law, allowing law enforcement to petition a judge to temporarily confiscate the guns of someone deemed to be a threat to themselves or someone else, and defended FL's laws prohibiting open carry is going to "look into" the current laws for you and make it better?

So, I'm clear the president who:
A) Believes in taking guns first, due process second
B) Told the ATF that bump stocks will be a machine gun even though they'd decided multiple times before him they weren't
C) Signed a bill that ended the dickey amendment allowing the US government to research what rights they can limit (aka "study gun violence")
D) Went on record via twitter about 3d printed firearms- "I am looking into 3-D Plastic Guns being sold to the public. Already spoke to NRA, doesn’t seem to make much sense!", Sarah Hukabee later would comment that the DOJ settled on the matter (relating to the Defense distributed case) without the president's approval. The case ended in DD's favor, meaning that Trump was not for it- an anti-gun and anti-1a stance.

The only people who think Trump is pro-2a are sipping the kool-aid. He's not pro 2a, he just throws the 2a a bone once in a while to not alienate a voter base.

I'm sure someone's going to bring up SCOTUS- lets be clear on that: The only thing his justices have done of significance is repeal Row v Wade, scotus hasn't done squat for gun owners since Bruen.
yes
She has to answer to the president

The president has a mandate to adhere to by us

The fact he’s looking at Biden era changes doesn’t get your Jimmy jumping?
You the the master bloviator means everything he says? You think we’re gonna take Gaza too?

He knows he messed up when he gave the ATF the go ahead to ban gay ass bump stocks and perhaps, just maybe he’s trying to fix it….

And yes, he has done more for your gun rights, voting rights and human rights than any other politician in my voting lifetime in a month

And I’m not even a “trumper”

But FFS the enemy of your enemy and all that my guy
 
But it's like the responses to the USAID revelations on TwitterX - billions of dollars absconded or going to nefarious things, and it's "but but but the STARVING CHILDREN!!1!"

Yeah, the starving children aren't seeing one red cent of that money.

And even if they were, there comes a point when you have to go all Sam Kinison.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0LUdqFJEPI

one of Sam's funnier skits.

FWIW, I'd Hit Pam Bondi
 
Back
Top Bottom