GOA is defending this kid
GOA: Media Demonizes Apparent Self-Defender Kyle Rittenhouse
UPDATE: Joe Biden Smears Apparent Self-Defender Kyle Rittenhouse
‘We Don’t Think He Did Anything Wrong’: Gun Rights Group Details Why They Think The Rittenhouse Shooting Was ‘Self Defense’
crickets, silence from nra. Because for nra People are only entitled to self defense If they are over 21 took a class and paid a fee and got an nra approved Gun license
And cops wonder why our entire society is turning on them? I think even cop supporters like myself are having some serious doubts about throwing support behind them. Gee I wonder why? It's just another nail in the coffin of the NRA for me. In fact I might even join another gun club that doesn't require NRA membership or just lie about it. The sooner that Wayne and his gaggle of sycophants are gone the better.
The police have come out against Rittenhouse.
The NRA has a policy of never criticize the police no matter how wrong they may be. Never.
Do nothing or say nothing, but at least don't come out and throw the kid under the bus...
" Video shows the shooter had what looks like an AR-15 rifle, said Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association.
Pearson condemned the shooter's actions, pointing out there are also federal laws regarding crossing state lines with the intent to commit a crime.
"We have the laws," Pearsons said. "He violated them."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ab13/4ab13df8bd1d22508a20fc079248164141e13162" alt="www.dailyherald.com"
Guns were turned in after Kenosha shooting, but Antioch police won't say who owned them
Two guns were turned into police when a 17-year-old Antioch man charged in the Kenosha shootings surrendered himself, police said, but officials are not saying who owned the guns and whether they had valid firearm owners identification cards.
Note: ISRA is an affiliate of the NRA (same as GOAL), in fact, it's one of the bigger and better known affiliates.
Shit-for-brains doesn't deny saying it, claims he made that statement before he knew the facts of the case.