1836 to 1911 What a difference 75 years made.

I saw this picture on X and it kind of blew my mind.

US Government issue 1836 Flintlock with a US Government issue Issue 1911. (Actually a 1911A1)

View attachment 943300
too lazy to post a picture of G17, but it is what next 100yrs produced.
despite of all the '2 world wars' done in a screechy boomers voices, glock rules.
 
My grandfather worked the family cash crop fields (blackberry, wintergreen, etc.) with a pair of Belgian horses as a boy. He later saw his kid fly supersonic jets in the military and airliners across oceans. He also saw the dawn and maturation of the computer age.

This was issue when he was in diapers-

images


This is what he carried in Guam and the Philippines during WW2-

Garand-rifle-1945.jpg


And this was issue when he passed-

images
 
I heard Ken Hackathon tell the class, "The 1911 chambered in 45 ACP is the world's finest close quarters sidearm… and King of the feed way stoppages.”
Is that really true of the original service issued ones? I've heard the theory that they only became jam-o-matics after everyone in the civilian market started tightening tolerances.
 
Last edited:
Is that really true of the origin service issued ones? I've heard the theory that they only became jam-o-matics after everyone in the civilian market started tightening tolerances.

I thought we liked tighter tolerances. Isn't that the major difference between that super-accurate AR and that spray-and-pray AK???? ;)
 
I thought we liked tighter tolerances. Isn't that the major difference between that super-accurate AR and that spray-and-pray AK???? ;)
TightER is one thing, but some are just too tight without being properly fitted (Kimber). There can be a fine line between the German measure of Gudentite and too tight to work right.

BTW, how many years did it take before ak's were even close to as accurate as an AR (on release)?? IIRC, close to 75 years. [rofl2]

I still have the WW2 surplus 1911 that my father had bought, then turned into a race gun. Thing runs flawlessly. Even with the tolerances tightened up. Probably because it was done RIGHT.
 
too lazy to post a picture of G17, but it is what next 100yrs produced.
despite of all the '2 world wars' done in a screechy boomers voices, glock rules.

The thing with guns is there isn't that much room for innovation. So much brain power and money was put into what is essentially a fairly simple tool (by today's standard) that it just works.

Companies try to come up with new stuff all the time and most fail. Rifles designed over 60 years ago still get the job done in a battlefield.
 
The 2011 style pistol is just an evolution (which is why it's called a '2011') of the 1911 design. Not a ton that's different between the two. Over the past few years, a TON of companies are jumping onto that train. New tweaks are being marketed for them. Such as accepting grock magazines (meh). Some are now offering different grip materials, other than plastic. Others are cosmetic changes, in the texture of the grip, or slide cuts (I consider slide cuts more cosmetic).

IMO, if JMB had a child that also was into gun design/development like he was (and as prolific) the 2011 style would have come out a LOT sooner.
 
You shouldn't insult the greatest generation like that.
My grandfathers are from that generation. Both would say get a firm grip and it won't jam.

By the way, it is possible to bump fire a M1 Garand if you don't have a firm grip. It's like a M14 on steroids. I can do it better than this guy but I'm not nearly as funny. [rofl]

 
Back
Top Bottom