I don't think you understand how to play "gotcha." Is this going to be another "walking away from" thread?
View attachment 204913
You show two cursive G as definitive examples of a D. Look at the name Deborah, there is your independent example. You can't use the letters in question as definitive proof. That's circular logic, like saying the bible is true because the bible says so (its an example, I'm not arguing the truth or non-truth of the bible).
A cursive D has the tail at the top not the bottom, this holds for every example I've seen, including the D from Deborah on this page. A cursive D starts with a downstroke, a cursive G starts with an upstroke, as these do. You are seeing what you want to see, that does not make it so.
Also consider that if this was a D for dismissed, why is it that there are two entries that say dismissed and those do not contain a single letter G for guilty. But the three with the single letter (G for guilty) do
not say dismissed and include a fine, which would only accompany a guilty.
The plea NG is obviously Not Guilty and appears in all entries.
There is also an example of a motion. A motion to suppress with a clear "allowed". No other motions are noted.
The facts do not fit your position.
I get why the OP is saying what he is saying.