9th Circuit Strikes down Magazine Restrictions - Breaking

Forgive me if this has already been asked, but if they do allow standard capacity magazines, the rifle still has to be equipped with a "bullet button", right?
 
fencer said:
Forgive me if this has already been asked, but if they do allow standard capacity magazines, the rifle still has to be equipped with a "bullet button", right?
Click to expand...

I don't know, and I hadn't thought of that. But that's what drums are for, surely...;)
 
fencer said:
Forgive me if this has already been asked, but if they do allow standard capacity magazines, the rifle still has to be equipped with a "bullet button", right?
Click to expand...
Not sure, but the bullet button thing might have been a way around limited magazine capacity by utilizing chargers/stripper clips.
 
Waher said:
Not sure, but the bullet button thing might have been a way around limited magazine capacity by utilizing chargers/stripper clips.
Click to expand...

I don't think so, but IANA California L.

The bullet button sidesteps CA's definition of an "assault weapon" by removing an Evil Killy Feature, the detachable mag. That's a totally separate law than the capacity limit.
 
Uzi2 said:
Brownell's is out of Pmags.
I had an order in for a ten pack of Gen 2's and received a cancellation notice that they are out of stock. A check of their site shows lots of mags out of stock.
I'd say in a month, nobody will have any mags, between Kalifornians buying up quantities and others adding to stockpiles they'll likely be unobtanium soon.
Click to expand...
Yeah #metoo. I had an order for 50 cases of 100.
 
Mesatchornug said:
Clint Smith would be proud
Click to expand...
It didn't take a whole lot of AR ownership before I realized that
whatever mags we have ought to be loaded.
They're in a stuff sack hanging from a hook
on the inside of the safe door; closest thing I've got
to a ((grab'n'))go kit for guns.
 
AHM said:
It didn't take a whole lot of AR ownership before I realized that
whatever mags we have ought to be loaded.
They're in a stuff sack hanging from a hook
on the inside of the safe door; closest thing I've got
to a ((grab'n'))go kit for guns.
Click to expand...
Admittedly, I only have most of mine loaded, but I'm getting better.
 
Friday said:
So, CA didn't file for en banc this morning? They're slacking.
Click to expand...
CA has so many issues due to leftist incompetence. Like rolling blackouts because they invested so much on unreliable "green" wind and solar. But i am sure the radical Marxists will get around to it.
 
rivet_42 said:
{SNIP}... According to CRPA, "final resolution" could take one of four forms: (1) the state allows the Ninth's ruling of last week to stand, and does not appeal; (2) they can petition for a rehearing by the original 3 judge panel; (3) they request an en banc hearing; or (4) they appeal to SCOTUS. They have until August 28th to decide if and how they're moving forward.
Click to expand...

So, its Aug 29th - did CA Appeal or challenge the ruling ? File for En Banc hearing ?
Or is 28 Aug not really the deadline ?

Anyone have a status update on this gem ?
 
Does the CA en-banc appeal automatically place a hold on the existing 9th appellate decision; was a stay granted; or are dealers just running scared?
 
Rob Boudrie said:
Does the CA en-banc appeal automatically place a hold on the existing 9th appellate decision; was a stay granted; or are dealers just running scared?
Click to expand...

No clue. AKOU posted yesterday on FB that they're refunding thousands of orders and included the YT link.

ETA: I shouldn't have replied with simply "No" above. That's my bad. Not sure how it's playing out other than what AKOU has shared.
 
It's fairly common for appellants to be granted a stay of an order if they can successfully argue it would cause "irreparable harm". The best example is the case of of a ticket reseller ordered to disclose the source of the tickets. I don't know the final outcome, but a stay was granted because the bell of disclosure could not be unrung if the sellers won their appeal. I would expect that CA would argue "irreparable harm" if the 9th appellate decision was overturned en banc, and they would be right (speaking legally, nor morally) in that the order would have allowed ore mags into CA based on an order that was eventually overturned.

But, what I do not know (can some attorney chime in please???) is if filing the appeal of the appellate decision automagically places that decision on hold.
 

Similar threads

3rd Circuit Denies Rehearing In SAF Pennsylvania Gun Rights Victory
Replies
1
Views
149
oldguy68
oldguy68
Breaking: Police Arrest Trans Student For Planning Multi-School Shooting
Replies
19
Views
567
Dadstoys
Dadstoys
North Andover SWAT Standoff - Tango Down
Replies
0
Views
264
VTski4x4
VTski4x4
BREAKING NEWS: Scores Killed, Hundreds Injured as Extremists Riot in Boston Area
Replies
16
Views
999
Bfatz
Bfatz
Study Confirms 10+ Firearm Magazine Capacity Is 'Standard'
Replies
8
Views
453
tuna
tuna
Back
Top Bottom