A clear and rational argument from the bench...

[Andy in NH]

I really liked this explanation.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMC7Ntd4d4c

 

[clampett]

Ya gotta love a judge that has a AK47 on the wall in his chambers.

 

[Rick O'Shea]

Picking a p320 is cringe but love the logic.

 

[Markymk25]

Picking a p320 is cringe but love the logic.

It was a good choice since to someone that knows nothing about guns, a Glock frame still resembles a gun and while they may understand that a Glock frame by itself is inoperable, the fact that the fcu in a p320, which looks nothing like a gun, is the only thing that the 9th circuit believes is protected, is simple to understand and it makes you go “hmmm”

The unfortunate part is that most people who would actually learn anything from this video, will never watch it.

 

[sbhaven]

I really liked this explanation.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMC7Ntd4d4c

S

Thread '9th Circuit En Banc Rules As Expected For California In Duncan v. Bonta Mag Ban (Judge VanDyke Dissent Video Included)'

Mar 20, 2025

The Opinion:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.345123/gov.uscourts.ca9.345123.9034466212.1.pdf

Employing the methodology announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the en banc court concluded that California’s law comported with the Second Amendment for two independent reasons. First, the text of the Second Amendment does not encompass the right to possess large-capacity magazines because large-capacity magazines are neither “arms” nor protected accessories. Second, even assuming that the text of the Second Amendment...

• sbhaven
• Replies: 22
• Forum: General Discussion

• 

 

[Fixxah]

I really liked this explanation.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMC7Ntd4d4c

Rational and knowledgeable have no business in this discussion. This man breaks all those rules.

 

[Andy in NH]

S

Thread '9th Circuit En Banc Rules As Expected For California In Duncan v. Bonta Mag Ban (Judge VanDyke Dissent Video Included)'

Mar 20, 2025

The Opinion:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.345123/gov.uscourts.ca9.345123.9034466212.1.pdf

Employing the methodology announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the en banc court concluded that California’s law comported with the Second Amendment for two independent reasons. First, the text of the Second Amendment does not encompass the right to possess large-capacity magazines because large-capacity magazines are neither “arms” nor protected accessories. Second, even assuming that the text of the Second Amendment...

• sbhaven
• Replies: 22
• Forum: General Discussion

• 

Ooopsie on the dupe.

Different people click on different thread titles for different reasons and I scanned over yours quickly without seeing the video reference.

The video link was sent to me from a friend.

Just glad the info is getting out there!