If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
WTF are all Chicago cops corrupt pieces of human excrement?
you would think they would let that paper work slide for getting a POS off the street....a misdemeanor tho is better than a felony...but there should be no charges at all..just an award for ridding the city of a scumbag
Just a guess here, and playing devil's advocate - maybe it was a high enough profile incident that they didn't have the discretion they otherwise might have.
you would think they would let that paper work slide for getting a POS off the street....a misdemeanor tho is better than a felony...but there should be no charges at all..just an award for ridding the city of a scumbag
Unfortunately, the homeowner probably has bigger things to worry about than some overzealous paper pushers. From the article, it seems the home invaders were gang members, which means they'll likely be back for vengeance. You know, because he shouldn't have dared stand up for himself against them. They should be free to do whatever to whomever they want. I'll bet no one in that house is sleeping well at night.
Unfortunately, the homeowner probably has bigger things to worry about than some overzealous paper pushers. From the article, it seems the home invaders were gang members, which means they'll likely be back for vengeance. You know, because he shouldn't have dared stand up for himself against them. They should be free to do whatever to whomever they want. I'll bet no one in that house is sleeping well at night.
I'm glad he had it, even though it was illegal, because his daughter is alive. Thugs family probably has a civil suit now.
Sent from my SCH-I435 using Tapatalk 2
That saves one from local crap (and Chicago has a lot of local stuff, along with Cook Co.'s AWB).Sec. 24-10. Municipal ordinance regulating firearms; affirmative defense to a violation. It is an affirmative defense to a violation of a municipal ordinance that prohibits, regulates, or restricts the private ownership of firearms if the individual who is charged with the violation used the firearm in an act of self-defense or defense of another as defined in Sections 7-1 and 7-2 of this Code when on his or her land or in his or her abode or fixed place of business.