Introspection plus the privilege of a nanny-state license
to exercise a Federally-guaranteed civil right conditioned upon continuing suitability
may summon Massprudence.
This isn't a massprudence thing its an everywhere-prudence thing, road rage by default is viewed by courts as 99 out of 100 times being a retard conference where both people are at
fault. A DA or prosecutor would love to indict both parties for (insert some stupid shit here) and watch them get chewed to bits by the system.
Part of the problem is every jury in america has this default worldview of road rage- Ever witness a full blown roadrage incident? I've seen a couple that went fullest of retard. Most of them involve acts of mutual aggression. It's very common to see one driver get pissed off and the other just ignore it pretty much, and have it self-deescalate. (yes, sometimes one douche driver will just keep escalating, but smart people will just "train" them right to a police station like a trained mob in a video game. Then miraculously even then 999 out of 1000 times the douche guy decides "oh wait, this is not going to work in my favor...." aaaaand.... gone! like a flash.
I don't flip people off because I care about my LTC or blasting idiots. I don't flip them off because I don't need 4, 5, 6 figures worth of legal aggravation (and thats on a good day) with jail on a bad one. Eff that noise. I'll take the cheap way out, please.
ETA2: the other happy fun ball is what if the guy or lady you flip off is a piece of garbage that has /little or nothing left to lose? I'd much rather not "trigger" them. I'd rather than get aggravated, realize the futility of escalating (when you dont reciprocate the retard gestures, they feel empty and despondent lol) , and proceed onward. Hopefully when they get home their abused teenage son or daughter will finally put a cueball in a sock and frag them when they sleep off their afternoon drunk or heroin nap or something. I'd much rather those people be SomebodyElses's problem (tm).
Last edited: