Subie
One thing to keep in mind. Lighter guns are easier to carry. Heavier guns are easier to shoot.
That may seem obvious, but many people seem to forget this. My 6+ lb 9"(about) .460 XVR is much more pleasant to shoot than 11 ounce, .357 magnum 340PD.
Yep, right there with you. I've shot the Ruger Alaskan in .454 (the 2.5" one) and the .460 XVR 9" side by side. The .460 was WAY more comfortable, obviously owing to the longer barrel and extra weight.
If I wanted it as a range gun I'd go with an N frame or a Ruger. I'll practice with it enough to be confident but I'm looking at this more for carrying comfort than shooting comfort.
i do a good amount of hiking in NH (working on the 4,000 footer list)...as i said in the other carrying in the woods thread, look at the statistics of bear or moose attacks in new england or the area where you're going to be hiking...humans are more dangerous so prepare for them instead of wildlife...carry whatever is legal, has the most capacity, you're comfortable with and is not too heavy to lug around...or just buy a can of bear spray which will be lighter and cover all bases...that's just my opinion...so far i've only seen 1 bear cub and it was on the side of the highway and everyone was out of their cars taking pictures...it was terrifying
This is a pretty valid point. I'm drawn towards the idea of owning one revolver (provided it has a purpose), but between what you say and some research I just did, I wonder if a dedicated gun is worth the money and trouble. In a pinch I'd trust a 9mm to be viable against a black bear and I guess even that is unlikely.