Patriot
NES Member
why don't they just enforce the leash law?
OK, that's it! You're officially banned for making sense out of this!
![Smile [smile] [smile]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/001.gif)
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
why don't they just enforce the leash law?
OK, that's it! You're officially banned for making sense out of this!![]()
lets ban a**h*** politicians through out the U.S.
this should solve a few problems.
breeds of wild cats isn't the same as a domestic dog.
First off as much as I love dogs, there is no fundamental right enshrined in the establishment of our countries laws that protects individual ownership of animals. If the state wants to declare and animal or breed of animal dangerous to the general public and ban it they can do so.
Second, anyone who equates the arguments of gun owners fighting for their rights (aka you can’t blame the gun) with pit bulls (you can’t blame the dog) should instantly be rounded up, have all scholastic degrees revoked, placed in the nearest corner and be forced to wear a helmet.
For those lefties who may troll the board:
1) A firearm is an inanimate object. An inanimate object can not act on its own without direct control of an external influence. It can no more hurt or maim on its own than can your dining room chair, or the helmet that you should be wearing right now.
2) A dog is an animal. An animal will do what is in its nature, and as such, is subject to all the potential hazards of anything living, it can go nuts and despite what we think we know about them or how well trained, it can go crazy. Some animals are more predisposed to be predatory and dangerous than others. Take Tigers for instance, I am sure Siegfried and Roy had theirs well trained, and how’s that working out. Pit Bulls by their breeding were meant to be the way there are, that aggressive behavior is in their genetic code. They are in fact more predisposed, and physically capable to injure another living being that say a beagle. And, no matter how much anyone may wish to believe, ultimately these animals have a will of their own and may act independently. Thus if the state wants to regulate or ban them they can do so at will.
My firearm no matter how capable or effective it is at sending flying metal objects at high velocities from a tube is not and can not be pre-disposed to injure living being by hitting them with that high velocity metal object. It has no will. Only the user of such a device can impart will onto it.
These are not the same.
First off as much as I love dogs, there is no fundamental right enshrined in the establishment of our countries laws that protects individual ownership of animals. If the state wants to declare and animal or breed of animal dangerous to the general public and ban it they can do so.
Second, anyone who equates the arguments of gun owners fighting for their rights (aka you can’t blame the gun) with pit bulls (you can’t blame the dog) should instantly be rounded up, have all scholastic degrees revoked, placed in the nearest corner and be forced to wear a helmet.
For those lefties who may troll the board:
1) A firearm is an inanimate object. An inanimate object can not act on its own without direct control of an external influence. It can no more hurt or maim on its own than can your dining room chair, or the helmet that you should be wearing right now.
2) A dog is an animal. An animal will do what is in its nature, and as such, is subject to all the potential hazards of anything living, it can go nuts and despite what we think we know about them or how well trained, it can go crazy. Some animals are more predisposed to be predatory and dangerous than others. Take Tigers for instance, I am sure Siegfried and Roy had theirs well trained, and how’s that working out. Pit Bulls by their breeding were meant to be the way there are, that aggressive behavior is in their genetic code. They are in fact more predisposed, and physically capable to injure another living being that say a beagle. And, no matter how much anyone may wish to believe, ultimately these animals have a will of their own and may act independently. Thus if the state wants to regulate or ban them they can do so at will.
My firearm no matter how capable or effective it is at sending flying metal objects at high velocities from a tube is not and can not be pre-disposed to injure living being by hitting them with that high velocity metal object. It has no will. Only the user of such a device can impart will onto it.
These are not the same.
*********come on now.you cant be serious.beasts! any f***ing dog can be mean if not trained well and cared for in a proper manner.i dont give one flying f*** if it's a Pit bull or a goddamn cocker spaniel.f*** wads who mistreat thier animals and keep them for fighting purposes should be beaten to a pulp if you ask me.
dogs are a lot like people you treat them right and give them a good home and they turn out alright just like kids do. you leave the kid alone every day and dont feed it and abuse him the kid just like the dog is going to be screwed up.
Think about this as a potential alternative to the ban:
No ban of any kind, keep whatever you want to keep, but if your animal injures anyone you are de facto responsible. No tying up the courts, no defense. If your animal kills someone, you shall serve time for manslaugher, viciously maims someone, aggrevated assault and battery. A simple bite or nip, maybe just plain battery.
In otherwords, your choice of animal rearing has consequenses, dire ones. In that scenario, what type of animals would you choose to keep ?
You should be talking about Pedone like that.... he was only left alone for alittle while each day
Take out "PITBULLS" and "dog" and replace it with "EVIL BLACK GUNS" (or anyother gun word)
NOW YOU sound like the exact thing we are fighting.....![]()
![]()
![]()
Sorry not familiar with Pedone can anyone explain.