If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Brother, here we go again. Jack.
"Can penetrate a vest..." Seriously dude?
Stop copying stuff from Wikipedia!
One of the design intents for the standard 5.7×28mm cartridge type, the SS190, was that it have the ability to penetrate Kevlar protective vests—such as the NATO CRISAT vest—that will stop conventional pistol bullets.[36] Fired from the Five-seven, the 5.7×28mm SS190 has a muzzle velocity of 650 m/s (2,130 ft/s) and is capable of penetrating the CRISAT vest at a range of 100 m (109 yd), or 48 layers of Kevlar material (roughly equivalent to two stacked Level II Kevlar vest panels) at a range of 50 m (55 yd).[27][35] It is also capable of penetrating a PASGT vest at a range of 300 m (328 yd) or a PASGT helmet at a range of 240 m (262 yd).[27] FN states an effective range of 50 m (55 yd) and a maximum range of 1,510 m (1,651 yd) for the 5.7×28mm cartridge when fired from the Five-seven pistol.[10]
It cannot shoot as far and as accurate as mark 23 or be put in the water and shoot...
yepAre you talking about the H&K MK23?
So I want to know if someone has first hand experience with it. To know how it feels
If you need vest penetration why would you rely on any pistol?
Thanks!I have shot one. To me it feels like shooting a Walther P99. I am not impressed with it, though I have not needed the vest penetration aspect to it.
Dave
If you need vest penetration why would you rely on any pistol?
If you need vest penetration why would you rely on any pistol?
I can understand its law enforcement application, but even then it is a back up item.
Dave
Nothing can compare to mark 23.
Guys. But my point is why not get more capable pistol for the same money.
A .22LR also has super low recoil. So what? The only thing the five-seven has going for it in my opinion is the large magazine capacity relative to it's small(ish) size. The round itself is under powered, has very limited range, and is hard to find (and expensive.)
I'm pretty sure you're a troll, but just in case you're not: Using Brady Campaign propaganda statements to support the idea that a particular gun is "without minuses" is generally not going to lead to productive discussions on the site.
What the heck is troll? Someone for the gun control?
Ballistics are similar to a 22 Mag and the ammo is expensive and IIRC the armor piercing ammo is restricted to military and LEO use any way. If your thinking self defense why not a 9 mm or 45 caliber carbine of some kind.