Quiet
Banned
Wow. That is unexpected.
...and yet, many peeps said we got nothing in that horrible, horrible bill. ;-)
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Wow. That is unexpected.
Somehow, I don't think that in 2001, people were waiting two years for FID/LTC applications to be processed. Soooo....exactly what kind of requests was this person fulfilling?
...ensured deadlines and benchmarks for automating confinement records at 16-open and eight-closed DMH operated inpatient facilities were being met.
Successfully reduced the response time to requests from two years to less than 14 days.
how soon can you reapply?
how soon can you reapply?
Correction to this. How early can you renew a license?(I did not mean reapply from a denial)
I'm hearing Weymouth has a new licensing officer and he's giving ltc-a without restrictions. Saw a post on Facebook where someone got the license in about 3 weeks.
Can Anyone confirm this ??
We just received a phone call from the Reading Police Department informing us that they are no longer a "red" town. They wanted MFS and everyone else to know that they made the decision 6 months ago to operate as a "green" town...meaning first time applicants should expect to receive an unrestricted license.
You have to give them credit that they felt strong enough about this to reach out to us directly.
I'm looking move from Brookline and one of the towns that my wife and I are thinking about is Newton - I've heard it's no longer red and they'll issue ALP, but it's still red here and is in bold letters. Any info?
I've currently got a T&H LTC-A from Brookline. Thanks!
As of 2014, Newton was lifting restrictions upon request after 1 year. My guess is that they'll lift your restrictions when you renew.
Wow. I thought for Reading to go from red to green, they would have to change the name of the town.... Does anyone have experience with them lifting restrictions? I will post here when I learn more myself.
I spoke with Off. Martell last week about the abrupt change. They don't have the bandwidth to fight since the law change. It's just easier to issue unrestricted licenses than to potentially have the chief answer questions in court (like the Peabody chief) and look foolish when he can't give a good reason for restricting someone just because. I think they'd be open to lifting restrictions on someone who is squeaky clean and low risk.
^^This. PDs are changing their tune very quickly on restrictions either on restrictions either because they've decided the law is against them or because they've decided it's just not worth fighting. This is the case in Peabody which has stopped restricting license. You can thank Comm2A for this. It is very clear that our suit against Weymouth and Peabody is having a riffle effect. And we're not done.
Yes, Reading is a direct result of the Peabody case and Comm2A. It will be interesting to see what happens in notoriously red towns like Brookline, Watertown and Cambridge.^^This. PDs are changing their tune very quickly on restrictions either on restrictions either because they've decided the law is against them or because they've decided it's just not worth fighting. This is the case in Peabody which has stopped restricting license. You can thank Comm2A for this. It is very clear that our suit against Weymouth and Peabody is having a riffle effect. And we're not done.
Yes, Reading is a direct result of the Peabody case and Comm2A. It will be interesting to see what happens in notoriously red towns like Brookline, Watertown and Cambridge.
Thanks
Edit: Also, anyone have recent experience with Belmont? It's listed as red, but in the thread I see people getting ALP/NR.
What is the consensus when it comes to Peabody? I had my class A issued in 2012 and would like to have the restrictions removed. Anyone know of their attitude has since changed since the comm2a case?
Sent from my iPhone 5c using Tapatalk
Bold Red May Issue and/or are difficult to obtain a "Class A" "All Lawful Purposes" usually give out restricted such as "Sport and Target"
Any thoughts on changing Braintree to red?
Braintree absolutely meets this definition. You need 5 recommendation letters to even apply (where most towns don't require any). And the licensing officer specifically told me, "We do not accept general statements such as, 'all lawful purposes' or 'protection of life and property' for the LTC reason."
Despite the fact that some people do get unrestricted LTCs in Braintree, there's no ambiguity in that it's a difficult town to get it in.
Any thoughts on changing Braintree to red?
Braintree absolutely meets this definition. You need 5 recommendation letters to even apply (where most towns don't require any). And the licensing officer specifically told me, "We do not accept general statements such as, 'all lawful purposes' or 'protection of life and property' for the LTC reason."
Despite the fact that some people do get unrestricted LTCs in Braintree, there's no ambiguity in that it's a difficult town to get it in.
Per Commonwealth Second Amendment:
LICENSES TO CARRY ISSUED 2012-2013
BRAINTREE
LTC-A unrestricted - 499
LTC-A restricted - 76
LTC-B unrestricted - 14
LTC-B unrestricted - 1
FID cards - 61
Total licenses - 651
I'm guessing that a large proportion of those 76 restricted LTC-A licenses were first time applicants, but I don't have any facts to back that up. If so, they might be in line for "red" but, as you can see, the overwhelming majority of the licenses issued are unrestricted
The color coding does not factor in "extra crap" that a PD requires. It only is a comment on whether you can get a License with "Restrictions: None"