- Joined
- Oct 6, 2019
- Messages
- 2
- Likes
- 4
I'm a first time applicant and I was issued my LTC A with no restrictions in Peabody
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
That appears to be a policy change. How many reference letters were you required to submit with your application?Lives in Braintree. First time LTC applicant. Got my LTC in three weeks. No restrictions. This happened in September 2019.
Five. And I checked with my friends who did the letters. They don’t receive any inquiries from Braintree PD.That appears to be a policy change. How many reference letters were you required to submit with your application?
Thanks for that info. They shouldn't be asking at all. One of the untried challenges to the Massachusetts licensing law is to try to get a PD to deny (not just refuse to accept and process) an application due to a non-statutory requirement. Comm2A won a small case like that in Western Mass earlier in the year, but we need to make a bigger stink. Everyone has the right to (at leat) apply.Five. And I checked with my friends who did the letters. They don’t receive any inquiries from Braintree PD.
Number of references required by law = 0Five. And I checked with my friends who did the letters. They don’t receive any inquiries from Braintree PD.
Number of references required by law =02
Number of letters required by law = 0
CoP "Jump Jump"
LTC applicant "how high?"
In 2015 it said "optional", I just checked and it now says "as required by your licensing authority", but the law didn't change and there is no such requirement. And under the law the CoP doesn't have the authority to add conditions. So it's still an extra legal condition imposed by the CoP.It’s on the state form. No letters, but two references are required.
In 2015 it said "optional", I just checked and it now says "as required by your licensing authority", but the law didn't change and there is no such requirement. And under the law the CoP doesn't have the authority to add conditions. So it's still an extra legal condition imposed by the CoP.
How did this quiet additional requirement get slipped in with no one noticing.
The problem is that anyone who refuses and if the PD stays firm, it will take a minimum of 2 years before it would ever go in front of a judge and get a ruling. So the person does without a LTC for that long as a minimum and it is easy to understand that it is more prudent for the applicant to just comply with the extra BS. That is how the PDs get away with it and can continue to escalate upwards what they requrie beyond MGLs.Number of references required by law = 0
Number of letters required by law = 0
CoP "Jump Jump"
LTC applicant "how high?"
@Knuckle Dragger and don't forget suitability, you take away their extra legal requirements and they will just use that even more. Heck, even one additional line to the law would help the suitability BS "The Licensing authority must cite a specific incident which must have occured within the previous 5 years" There is a time limit on some actual convictions, why not on suitability.
FRB changes wording on forms whenever they are so inclined, no law needs to change for that. And the implication is that whatever is on the form "is the law" both to the PD and the applicants. Look at the address change law vs. the FRB form to do so (NO law requires any form or sending copies of LTCs) . . . and many PDs will ONLY accept the form with all the extra BS alleged to be required on said form.In 2015 it said "optional", I just checked and it now says "as required by your licensing authority", but the law didn't change and there is no such requirement. And under the law the CoP doesn't have the authority to add conditions. So it's still an extra legal condition imposed by the CoP.
How did this quiet additional requirement get slipped in with no one noticing.
The problem is that anyone who refuses and if the PD stays firm, it will take a minimum of 2 years before it would ever go in front of a judge and get a ruling. So the person does without a LTC for that long as a minimum and it is easy to understand that it is more prudent for the applicant to just comply with the extra BS. That is how the PDs get away with it and can continue to escalate upwards what they requrie beyond MGLs.
I'm a first time applicant and I was issued my LTC A with no restrictions in Peabody
Had interviews in Weymouth recently and the licencing officer said it takes 4 MONTHS, lol...So much longer than is the law right? Dont they have to make a decision within 60 days or something like that?
The licencing officer was very helpful beforehand and told me lots of things and what to put down as reasons for a LTC, so it seemed like he was kinda pro LTCs , at least it seemed that way.
Unless something changed recently, if you are <25 yo, you will get restricted.Anybody here with recent experience applying for an unrestricted LTC in Quincy? I'm going in tomorrow morning as a first-time applicant. I completed a safety course with certified live fire at the Mass Firearms School near in Holliston a few weeks ago.
Specifically, I'm wondering if the "All lawful purposes" justification will suffice. Generally, I'm wondering how intense the experience will be from an interviewing perspective.
Unless something changed recently, if you are <25 yo, you will get restricted.
I think that with the unlimited grace period for renewals, the shitheads like to stretch out the time to process new apps in the same manner. Jack.Reporting back on my visit to the Quincy PD for an unrestricted LTC application. The process is still quick and friendly, as I've seen othes report. The woman who helped me was informative and offered to answer any questions I had. She said you'd be surprised at the criminal records and backgrounds that some applicants come in with, but that I was a easy applicant.
She said it could be as long as 12 weeks to receive the license.
Well he could have go on how 12 weeks hardly seems "quick".Jack I always like the way you sugar coat your opinions with diplomacy.
She said it could be as long as 12 weeks to receive the license.