• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Gun & ammunition Hoarding

Apparently our new attorney general elect plans to place limits on how many guns a person can own in their lifetime as well ammunition: This was taken directly from her web site:
  • Work with the Massachusetts Legislature on measures designed to limit gun and ammunition hoarding, including limits on annual and lifetime gun purchases.
Judging from the gunshop crowds, she should rephrase it a bit: "Work with the Legislature to increase Gun & Ammo sales..."
 
It’s not just Jews. It’s Armenians, Russians, American Indians, Ukrainians, Cambodians, Rwandans, Syrians, and especially Chinese who have been disarmed and then slaughtered.

It can happen anywhere, and at any time. The worst thing is that the leaders who are pushing this know it. It’s not about crime, kids or violence. It’s about control, power and forced obedience.
Except Russians and Ukrainians were never disarmed. This is a myth.

That part of the world was always poor and never had enough production bases to produce enough weapons for the army. When a soldier went home or died, his rifle was given to the next soldier. There were no gun stores. Pistols were EXTREMELY rare. Even during the Red revolution, the only way Communists were able to take get weapons is when they got military units to side with them. There was no excess production.

Later, in the 1930's, arms production was very limited. Just take a look at the production numbers for Mosin-Nagant rifles during the 1920s and 1930s. USSR did not have enough money to supply its military. This is plainly visible by the fact that the Soviets were still using a gun from 1890s as a primary infantry weapon in WW2. There are stories of troop charges where soldiers were not given rifles and were told to run behind soldiers with guns and pick them up if the person in front died.

Even after WW2, the Soviets had difficulties producing enough firearms. For example, the SKS was initially created as SVT-40 in 1940 and was supposed to replace the Mosin. Start of the war, Germans bombed the factory that was producing SVT effectively ending its production. Based on the experience of WW2, the Soviets made changes to it and called it SKS. The rifle was officially rolled out in 1945 but could not get into large-scale production until 1949. Even then, only one factory was producing the rifle! There were only about 2 million of them made. Keep in mind, Soviet Army size in 1949 was about 2.8 million soldiers.

In 1947, AK-47 was created and it wasn't until mid 1950's when production was large enough to allow soviets to supply its allies. all extra production was sold abroad. As a result, there was virtually no AK's in private hands until the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Heck, my brother-in-law told me stories of his time in the soviet military. He never had a weapon assigned to him. He was only given one during firing exercises and patrol. Most AKs in his unit were 30+ years old, and rusted as hell, and many would not cycle.

As you can see, the myth of disarmament of Russians and Ukranians is in fact a myth. Russia never had enough weapons to make available to civilians.
 
If our side can routinely get TROs so that this crap doesn't negatively effect people while the court battle goes on for years before the anti-civil rights crowd loses, that will change their willingness to throw bullshit bills at the wall to see what sticks.

The commies are counting on their unconstitutional crap remaining law for years while stalling in court. If courts prevented them from using that tactic, they'd stop.
The term in "Injunction", not TRO :cool:
 
Problem.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom