Just read through this thread. What we really need is some lobbyist organization working for us, and I think GOAL does this?
It needs to be an education campaign more than anything IMO.
We had a dicussion at work after sandy hook. One of the ladies, whose husband is an avid hunter, and was in the army said, 'why does anyone need an automatic weapon that can fire 30 bullets in 3 seconds?
I said, 'you realize that we don't have the same weapons the army has. your husband's handgun can shoot just as fast as the weapon the guy at sandy hook had?" she didn't know that. I said, 'the only difference between that weapon and what your husband has for hunting is that his holds 4 rounds, not 30, but it will shoot as fast". Again, she didn't know that.
I can go on with this. I believe we need to stop harping on whether they call it a 'clip', who TF cares about that. Start working on the bigger picture.
killings did not go down during the AWB. How come your elected officals get protected by people with guns, yet you can't protect yourself? Alls sorts of these bigger points.
Personally, I think restrictions will come nationally, like gun shows sales, and limits on capacity. OTH, I think we should go on the offensive, and get something for this. I posted this on another forum. My initial suggestion was say, 'ok, this is what we get from you, but we want a national carry program.' I think rather than have something pushed on down with nothing back, (which as I stated is my personal opinion of what will happen), get some compromise.
For all those who just say , 'shall not be infringed', I say, you have already been infringed. Except for the few states like Alaska, if you need to get a permit, you have already been infringed. What can you carry? Been infringed. How many rounds? Been infringed. etc. etc.The question is, how much more will it happen.