Grendizer138
NES Member
The problem is almost always the shooter, not the rifle.Get better rifles, folks.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
The problem is almost always the shooter, not the rifle.Get better rifles, folks.
Which was what I was going for, and while I need to tighten things up for sure at 200 yards those were all hits.I dont know why people expect anything “good” from M855 being a 3 pc bullet crammed together as fast as they can make.
If its nato stamped brass it most likely was rejected for something other than any safety concerns.
Velocity deviations, to many “crooked” bullets, sealant failure and such.
M193 and M855 should be hits on torso size target expectations.
Its all good. Just keep expectations a tad low when buying bulk ammo.
i promise to re-test and will post results here, from IMI M855 as i have plenty of it.Putting M855 through a great rifle is still going to deliver M855 results
This youNope but hand me any common service rifle with a proper sling on it from the late 1890's to now, and some decent ammo and a 6" round white plate anywhere from 100-400yds I will stand there all day off hand and slap that target around without much effort. Let me go prone off of a sand bag and I will wear the paint off of it in short order. Bump it up to a full size IDPA target at 600yds so I can see it better and I'm good. I literally grew up doing just that, I was expected to, my father was an expert marksman in the coast guard and air force reserve, and he ran a pretty successfull kitchen table ffl all throught the 80's and 90's, mostly flipping surplus rifles, and I fully reaped the benefits of it. To put it in perspective I didn't own a rifle or shotgun with a scope or any type of optic on it until about 2007, first AR I ever shot that didn't have a carry handle was probably in 2010. That is also why I will always tell anyone that their practice and training matters a hell of a lot more than their equipment. Anyone that tells me you need a bull barrelled precision rifle, worked up handloads, and a 10-16x scope to shoot 1 moa at 100yds needs to ditch the high magnification scopes and bullshit for a year or two, pick up a decent service rifle, a stack of ammo, and spend some serious time learning some real fundamentals and, most importantly, losing their flinch.
i just want to see a 6'' pie plate at 400 yards.....................I want to see you nail the 6” pie plate at 400 yards offhand................
This you
i just want to see a 6'' pie plate at 400 yards
Nice , happens sometimes.result. not a great group, but not a bad one neither.
View attachment 551941
If I would shoot it from tavor it would be probably around 3moaNice , happens sometimes.
You can get ok groups with it but dont expect it lot to lot.
If I remember correctly ready the mil spec M855 was 3.15 moa using a average median . What I dont know is how many different groups did the test to get that median#
My dad always said median averages where used to widen the acceptance specs on anything.
probably but when people buy M855 and wonder why they get 3-5 moa they should not be shocked surprised or unhappyIf I would shoot it from tavor it would be probably around 3moa