This may be a decent time to interject an article I’ve come across just recently . . . the gent seems a bit perturbed, to say the least, with good reason!
(PA)
About guns and government control
April 10, 2008 09:50am
JUST as the sign of the cross tends to discombobulate vampires, stopping them in their tracks, equivalent creatures – such as the hysterically paranoid, anti-personal-responsibility fraternity – go completely apoplectic and phobic at the sight of an autonomous citizen armed with the "great equalizer" of a firearm.
This hysteria has been reawakened in many with the recent death of Charlton Heston. Much has been made of his affiliation with the National Rifle Association, muddying the memory of a man who was a great actor and activist.
"Kill the gun culture", scream the historically ignorant. Our political betters have signed on for the responsibility of "taking care " of us and all they ask in return is that we surrender the devices they seek to employ unilaterally – and that we are loyal to whatever they want to do with our lives, fortunes and sacred honor. But have you observed, that when danger threatens you and your family, the police are always someplace else?
The Gauleiters of the superstate may not like it, but the absolute right of the individual citizen to protect himself, his family and the wider community is not obviated by the absence of the constabulary.
In Shane, arguably the greatest western film, Alan Ladd pointed out to Jean Arthur that: "A gun is a tool, no better and no worse than an axe or any other tool; a gun is as good as the man using it."
Today it is considered too dangerous for most citizens to own a gun, but it is apparently viewed as not too dangerous to release child molesters, rapists and murderers into the community.
After a recent child murder in California, we were informed 400,000 perverts are listed on a government "sex register" in that state alone.
Closer to home, much has been made recently of the release of sex offenders into the community. It is not too difficult to imagine state governments releasing funnel-web spiders and crocodiles into cities, while whispering sweet nothings into our ears that there is nothing to worry about – because each creature is on a register somewhere.
People acquire firearms for the same reason they have created a growing industry of private security and alarm systems. Government is quite simply not performing its primary function of protecting life, liberty and property.
Some examples here in Australia:
An elderly woman is murdered by an illegal immigrant – smothered to death with a pillow. An old Digger is murdered by a 14-year-old youth recently escaped from a government "secure" facility. The murder weapon: a knife. A baby is snatched from the bedroom of her deaf parents by a man with a bus ticket in his hand provided by a government department. That ticket was to allow the disadvantaged youth to visit his family and was given to him by the same type of bureaucrats who have been given responsibility for "controlling" firearms – which are permitted to farmers to control pests, but absolutely denied for personal protection in Australia.
So we must consider the manifest failure of government departments and the prison system to protect victims.
Governments and police regulate those who might legally possess firearms more than they act to prevent guns ending up in the hands of violent criminals. It's easier. Governments can't stop violence, so they go after those who can. To be seen to be doing something they have decided to beat up on inanimate objects; disarming the honest and the brave while doing little against the criminals and crazies. What a primitive mindset; a bit like blaming the pot for burning the beans.
(PA) = PICTURE ADDED
.
![[sad]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/004.gif "Sad [sad]")
