No, I am agreeing with RKG statement that Heller does not define much of anything outside the home.I think that many...you...are also trying to make it read more broadly than it does as well.
That said, many are making the argument that it "limited it to the home" which I presumed RKG was as well... There's a big difference between "only in the home" and "outside the home not defined".
It opens the door - now we have to walk through. I think I am in agreement with RKG's later statement.
I have no illusions of the difficulty we will face in defining the limits of state and federal infringement. My point is that the manner in which the door was opened by SCOTUS now means that this entire process could very well play out with nothing more than a failure to grant cert from the high court with the circuit/appeals court bit-by-bit outlining what they will permit until there is a clear conflict.
I completely understand that "shall not be infringed" will not likely be respected in my life time (with or without the English common law caveat of persons convicted after due process losing this and other rights).