You're 100% wrong. A full size gun is more accurate than a subcompact for many reasons. The longer barrel in the full size allows the bullet to stablize more than in a short barrel. Plus, the longer sight radius is easier for your eyes to pick up on. Plus, having the smaller light weight gun the gun won't absorb the recoil as much as a full size causing more issues to happen. Look at any research anywhere and you will find that you are wrong. If you're shooting better with the compact good for you but the gun isn't as easy to shoot as a full size. I carry subcompact guns myself but can shoot my full size guns MUCH better for the above stated reasons.
You make good points. The longer barrel will inevitably stabilize the bullet more... which equals better accuracy at longer ranges. However a Glock 30's purpose is more of the "personal", up-close kind rather than the longer range that, say, a Glock 34 is made for. I think it'd be silly to say that he should have gotten a larger gun for his first gun. I believe Vic uses his Glock 30 for concealed carry. So his choice of a subcompact pistol is a very good choice. And the Glock 30 is more than accurate enough for self defense. Even in saying that I don't feel like I'm giving the Glock 30 the credit it deserves regarding it's accuracy. It's VERY accurate.
You're right...Longer sight radius does aid in better accuracy. But that's only in terms of helping one keep their sights better aimed. That doesn't speak to the inherent accuracy of the gun...say... when it's bench rested. I know of some Glock 30 owners that swear it is more accurate than its bigger brother. All I know is that mine was exceptionally accurate. I'll also admit I've never fired the Glock 21... so I haven't compared.
As for recoil... the Glock 30 is the lightest shooting .45 auto I've ever shot. And I've shot full size steel and scandium 1911's, as well as the commander, and officer 1911's. Again, that's my experience... I did not scientifically measure the recoil. I don't know if you've ever shot a Glock 30... but many who have will tell you the same thing regarding it's surprising ability to dampen the recoil... and to be one of the softest shooting .45's out there. A quick search on GlockTalk and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Anyway... I don't mean to be argumentative at all... I guess we're just coming from two different perspectives. You seem to be coming from a very general, blanket perspective... A+B+C always = D... and I seem to be coming from a subjective one. A+B+C doesn't always = D. It depends on the shooter. And it depends on the gun.
Either way... we're off topic... but at least we're both happy for Vic? Hehe...
![Grin [grin] [grin]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/041.gif)
Last edited: