Range Report: Noveske AR-10 vs. Remington 700 at 300 yards

Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
5,769
Likes
3,543
Feedback: 15 / 0 / 0
I enjoyed a nice afternoon at the range today comparing an AR-10 to a Remington 700, both in .308. Shooting was at 300 yards and from the bench. Weather was a very pleasant 80 degrees, clear skies, light breeze with occasional gusts primarily right to left.

The AR-10 is based on an ArmaLite stripped lower with magpul stock and grip. The trigger is a Geissele two-stage set at approximately 3.5 pounds (2 pounds initial pull, 1.5 pounds second stage). The upper is from Noveske with a 21-inch barrel. A PWS FSC30 brake is pinned/welded. The optic is a Leupold 4.5-14x50 LR/T w/illuminated retical in a LaRue SPR mount. Low quality cell phone pics follow.

2010-06-30-ar10.jpg


The Remington 700p has 26-inch barrel. The gun is stock with the exception of a Jewell trigger set at 1.5 pounds. The scope is a Leupold 8.5-25x50 LR/T w/illuminated reticle in Badger Ordnance rings and rail.

2010-06-30-rem.jpg


My goal today, apart from practicing shooting, was to see how the AR10 compared to the 700 and in particular to measure the velocity drop from the 26-inch barrel of the 700 to the 21-inch AR10 barrel. Here is the chronograph output at 10 feet from the muzzle, with each row of data representing 10 shots fired. I compared ammunition from the same boxes in each case (20 round boxes, split between each rifle) for three types of 168 grain open tip match ammunition. Black Hills is new-manufacture red box ammunition:

Code:
REM 700       AVG  STDDEV   HI   LOW
Federal      2684    8.0  2696  2672		
Hornady      2667   15.6  2695  2650		
Black Hills  2697   22.0  2741  2670		

AR10          AVG  STDDEV   HI   LOW  LOSS  LOSS%
Federal      2651    9.0  2672  2640   33   -1.2%
Hornady      2655   10.4  2677  2639   12   -0.4%
Black Hills  2630   16.8  2671  2605   67   -2.5%

The velocity drop from the 700 to the AR10 is pretty small. Federal ammunition showed the most consistency and Black Hills was unimpressive by comparison.

As for accuracy, the usual caveats apply, most importantly being that my shooting skills render just about anything I have to say as highly subjective. Having said that, the accuracy winner is the 700. This isn't too surprising. Here are a couple of my better 5-shot groups for the day. I can live with this at 300 yards and a little irregular cross-wind:

2010-06-30-g2.jpg


2010-06-30-g3.jpg


Here is the best of the day from the AR10:

2010-06-30-g1.jpg


I tried to even things out as much as possible, in particular turning the Rem 700 scope magnification down to 14x to match the max on the AR10. I also shot the AR10 off of a bag instead of the bipod to see if that helped (it did). I just had a little more trouble holding it together with the AR. It grouped just fine, but in a wider pattern than I was able to get from the bolt gun. Loosely speaking, I am fairly confident I could hit a 3-inch target at 300 yards with the 700 most of the time. With the AR10, to get more-likely-than-not hits I think I would need a 4-6 inch target. But that's just my experience on one day, so take it for what it's worth.

I will say this for the AR10: if I had to shoot anything more than once it kicks the 700 all over the place. The AR ran flawlessly all day, recoiled less, and has the ability to pour rounds on target (and 20-round preban mags are available for those in Mass).
 
Last edited:
Great range report.

I have a very similar Remington 700, but a slightly different AR-10. They're a great pair of rifles.
 
Most people who think bolt guns are slow don't really know how to run them.

You should re-run the test from whatever field shooting position you are most likely to use these rifles from. Prone from a bipod would be my guess.
 
Most people who think bolt guns are slow don't really know how to run them.

You should re-run the test from whatever field shooting position you are most likely to use these rifles from. Prone from a bipod would be my guess.

There's a difference between slow and slower.

A bolt gun is slower on follow-up shots than a semi-auto unless you can manipulate the bolt while requiring your target AND it takes you longer to reaquire your target than manipulating your bolt.

It's similar to the comparison of accuracy. Modern semi-autos are accurate, but they are less accurate than a bolt-gun when both are equally well tuned.
 
There's a difference between slow and slower.

A bolt gun is slower on follow-up shots than a semi-auto unless you can manipulate the bolt while requiring your target AND it takes you longer to reaquire your target than manipulating your bolt.

It's similar to the comparison of accuracy. Modern semi-autos are accurate, but they are less accurate than a bolt-gun when both are equally well tuned.

This is incorrect. If you drive a bolt gun correctly there is no "re-acquiring" of the target. Correct body position, good sight picture and cheek weld with proper follow through is all that is needed. I don't care if you have a 18" barrel with no brake on concrete. You drive it correctly and you should be able the see hits happen on paper at 100 yards. Nice write up btw econ.
 
Wow, great report. I'm impressed with the consistency of the Federals. That must be one tight process at their plant. Thanks for taking the time to do all that work.
 
Is the AR-10 heavier than the R700?

Yes. Without the bipod the AR10 weighs 14 pounds unloaded while the Rem. 700 comes in at 11.5 pounds. Whenever I think my AR15 with S&B short dot and LaRue rails feels heavy (at 9 pounds) I grab the AR10 -- it makes just about anything else feel light.
 
Nice report. I read a report by a custom rifle smith regarding the ideal barrel length for a 308 rifle. He reported on both velocity and accuracy and his conclusion was that there was little or no gain for barrels greater than 24".
 
Nice report. I read a report by a custom rifle smith regarding the ideal barrel length for a 308 rifle. He reported on both velocity and accuracy and his conclusion was that there was little or no gain for barrels greater than 24".

You have a source for that? There is no correlation between length and accuracy.
 
Economist,

Nice rigs you got there. Start shooting from prone and get your basic marksmanship skills down (postion straight behind the rifle, NPA, breathing, hold, finger position on trigger, consistent cheek weld, trigger pull, etc) and your groups will tighten up significantly. Hang out over at snipers hide and spend your time there reading, listening, and question asking and you'll be surprised how your skill level will come up.

I've shot almost every shooting discipline there is and nothing does it for me like long range rifles. For me, they're even more fun than machineguns.

2-3.jpg
 
If there is little or no gain then why do Palma and NRA Long Range shooters typically have 30 inch tubes?

B

Longer barrel = more velocity = more range and more consistency. There's a trade there, though, a long barrel means more barrel flex. There's another thread on this I can't find right now with a link to an explanation of barrel harmonics, but most of the time, the velocity gains outweigh the reduced rigidity.
 
Longer barrel = more velocity = more range and more consistency. There's a trade there, though, a long barrel means more barrel flex. There's another thread on this I can't find right now with a link to an explanation of barrel harmonics, but most of the time, the velocity gains outweigh the reduced rigidity.

http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/102426-Long-Range-Barrel-Lenths

I am a little unsure how consistency is a factor in the above statement?
 
Nice report. I read a report by a custom rifle smith regarding the ideal barrel length for a 308 rifle. He reported on both velocity and accuracy and his conclusion was that there was little or no gain for barrels greater than 24".

Bryan Litz, corporate ballistician for Berger Bullets, professional aerodynamicist, and champion long range shooter disagrees with your "custom rifle smith".
 
Economist,

Nice rigs you got there. Start shooting from prone and get your basic marksmanship skills down (postion straight behind the rifle, NPA, breathing, hold, finger position on trigger, consistent cheek weld, trigger pull, etc) and your groups will tighten up significantly. Hang out over at snipers hide and spend your time there reading, listening, and question asking and you'll be surprised how your skill level will come up.

I've shot almost every shooting discipline there is and nothing does it for me like long range rifles. For me, they're even more fun than machineguns.

2-3.jpg

+1

I just started shooting long range practical matches and I am hooked. This after 11 years of NRA KD shooting.

ETA: I'd have to say that sniper's hide has the best content on the web in this area.
 
Back
Top Bottom