If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
So by this argument if one were to stick 40 oz worth of lead to the side of a pistol then illegal? I think youre thinking too hard.
A 9mm Trojan with a magwell and empty magazine can be overweight.... where is Knuckledragger?
You can lose weight by removing some of the frame underneath the grips.
What are you talking about?
OP is checking to see if his pistol fits in the requirements of IDPA / USPSA divisions. Some of the divisions have weight limits.
What I don't understand is why you're weighing much lighter than I am.
Beat me to it. I saw the thread title and thought of Brent.
ETA: Or was it Chuck Z from New Bedford?
You're fine at 42.6. I'm at 43.5 and that's after changing out the guide rod and cutting out some frame material from under the grip panels. I was right at 43oz. until I put on new grips, and those are really necessary.
I'm at a loss at this point. I'm hoping to find a good gunsmith who can machine some material out of the slide or frame. I don't have a lot of non-invasive options at this point. The ambi-safety only gains me 1/8 oz. If I change to a plastic mainspring housing I lose the magwell - another necessity.
At this point I'm seriously thinking about switching back to Production for Areas 7 & 8 this year.
What I don't understand is why you're weighing much lighter than I am.
You just want me to stay out of L10!.
USPSA Single Stack has a 43 ounce limit like ESP in IDPA.
USPSA Single Stack has a 43 ounce limit like ESP in IDPA.
My son and I shoot Glocks, he shoots a 34 in production and I use a 35 both Gen 3. We're left handed though so the only part of the mag release that bothered us was the sharp edges,but I sanded those down. So your problem is easily solved! Just shoot lefty!You're getting your wires crossed, these guys are mostly talking about IDPA. In USPSA this gun is probably a "Limited Minor" gun regardless of weight, a lot simpler of a dilemma.
In general USPSA equipment rules are a lot simpler and less ****y. The IDPA rules are often bordering on the bizarre.
The only USPSA equipment rule that irritates me is the aftermarket mag release rule on pistols that run in production. I can't use a vickers release on a Gen3 G34 because it's not an OEM part. So that means I'm stuck with the glock ext release (which is way too long and stabs the shit out of my hand) or the OEM standard release which is too short and I almost have to roll the pistol to dump the mag easily. Thankfully it's not the biggest impediment, I got a ways to go before mag changes mean much in terms of my score....![]()
I'm actually more mad at Glock about this than USPSA folk, though. Glock ****ing has an intermediate release that they supposedly sold to feds and other LE agencies, but for some bizzare reason this intermediate release is a restricted part not to be sold nor distributed commercially. It doesn't make any sense... they could probably sell a shitload of them.
ETA: I post this understanding that I could possibly be wrong about production equipment rules in this regard (I know they change once in awhile) and I would love to be wrong, actually....![]()
-Mike
Can't you have the slide machined to lose some weight?
If you're lightening the slide for a competitive advantage. If you're doing it make weight restrictions, perhaps not. The problem with the rule is convincing the match director why you've made the modification. Given the rule, it's probably safer to try and take the weight off the frame.Prohibited modifications and features: Slide lightening, cuts, ports, or any milling deemed to provide a competitive advantage
An external part which extends only the length of the magazine-release button is specifically allowed in section 21.6 of the 2009 interpretation, whether the part is OEM or aftermarket. If the part provides a larger surface area (a big head, a button, a paddle, etc) or is different than the original part in any dimension other than length, the part is only permitted if it is an OEM part available on an approved model of gun.
17) I have an approved Production Division gun, and the manufacturer now offers a cool mag-release button on their “custom shop” versions of that gun. Can I use that mag-release button, since it is “an OEM part”?
ANSWER: It depends. An external part which extends only the length of the magazine-release button is specifically allowed in section 21.6 of the 2009 interpretation, whether the part is OEM or aftermarket. If the part provides a larger surface area (a big head, a button, a paddle, etc) or is different than the original part in any dimension other than length, the part is only permitted if it is an OEM part available on an approved model of gun.
Note that an internal modification to a magazine-release mechanism which results in shifting the magazine-release laterally (i.e., making the part stick out further on one side of the gun) would be considered an “internal modification”, and is allowed.
Also note that parts from “custom shop” guns are only considered “OEM parts” if the “custom shop” model is on the NROI list of approved guns. If NROI has not certified the “custom shop” gun for USPSA Production Division, using a custom-shop part may be an “external modification”, resulting in a “new/unapproved model” which would be illegal for USPSA Production Division. Contact NROI for an official ruling before switching to the new part.
My son and I shoot Glocks, he shoots a 34 in production and I use a 35 both Gen 3. We're left handed though so the only part of the mag release that bothered us was the sharp edges,but I sanded those down. So your problem is easily solved! Just shoot lefty!