Interesting that a liberal state trashed another liberal states business. To bad the CT AG doesn’t tell her to stick it.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Looking for what though? Non-MA compliant guns?
I don't think it's constructive to re-hash the 7/20 thing, but I will just leave it with the idea that there seems to be two camps--idealists and those who follow realpolitik. In terms of perspective, when you say "affect their bottom line," I think it's important to distinguish between a 10% reduction in revenue versus being financially ruined--which is likely what would have happened to those battling the AG with her bottomless coffers.The 7/20 Mandate was a chance for many FFLs to group together and become a united front against Maura and defy her "interpretation" but the majority of FFLs in this state bent over for her because they knew it would affect their bottom line if they didn't. Plus - without online competition - marking up their ammo/gear prices 20% to 40% because they are the only game in town, along with not carrying niche cartridges is another major reason why I don't frequent FFLs in Massachusetts.
You don't get it! AG does NOT want anything gun-related shipped into MA, not to legal gun owners and really not even to FFLs. You're giving them ammo to continue and a Cease & Desist Order whereby TS will be forced to agree never to ship anything to MA. Check out Sportsman's Guide if you doubt me . . . people have tried to order empty gun cases from them and been denied and that was ~10 yrs ago.
I emailed WCVB and said they should run a story on how instead of publishing a letter informing sellers that they should verify that MA buyers have a license before shipping, the AG risks unlicensed buyers getting ammo so they can maintain a quiet methodology of blackmailing dealers on a one by one basis. They can't do both, and they've chosen to wage a war on 2A rather than doing what they claim is in the best interest of safety in making sure only licensed buyers get ammo.To add on to that, since it is an interstate transaction regarding ammo, state laws don't matter. Only federal. The purchaser is exclusively on the hook for any state legalities he/she might be violating. The out of state seller has no skin in the game. I don't think the seller by federal law even needs to check the purchuser's age.
Healey has people in EOPPS every day going through MIRCS records in real time. I've spoken to dealers who have received a phone call from the AG's office about a transaction within minutes (as in under 5) of a transaction being made and they are asking questions. It's 100% intimidation tactics from the gestapo in her office.
I don't think it's constructive to re-hash the 7/20 thing, but I will just leave it with the idea that there seems to be two camps--idealists and those who follow realpolitik. In terms of perspective, when you say "affect their bottom line," I think it's important to distinguish between a 10% reduction in revenue versus being financially ruined--which is likely what would have happened to those battling the AG with her bottomless coffers.
Do you expect shops that will lose a sale to an internet FFL over $25 to carry admittedly niche cartridges?
Could be a local shop owner, tired of people buying online instead of their own jacked up prices... just speculation though...
One thing the gun parlor didn't consider though......is that gun owners pay attention to detail. They'll be lucky to last to q2 2018. Boycott.
Where can I find the list of suppliers who are approved to sell to MA?
Healey has people in EOPPS every day going through MIRCS records in real time. I've spoken to dealers who have received a phone call from the AG's office about a transaction within minutes (as in under 5) of a transaction being made and they are asking questions. It's 100% intimidation tactics from the gestapo in her office.
My point was that I don't think it was reasonable or realistic to expect MA FLLs to defy the AG, however nice it might've been. Furthermore, there are several FFLs that have demonstrated a commitment to fight the 7/20 (and general MA firearms law) nonsense. I think those that have done so deserve our encouragement rather than our scorn.Not too sure what you are debating over here. Financial ruin or not, I don't care what their reasoning was to bend over for Maura...They made their decision to go along with her Mandate and I made my decision to stop supporting MA gun shops because of it.
I don't expect anything from Mass gun shops. The majority of them do not carry a great variety of cartridges; especially defensive ammo; hence why I take my business to other vendors who do. Those vendors so happen to be of the online variety. Obviously this specific online vendor that TGP threw under the bus was making a big enough dent in their profit for TGP to even think of conspiring with the WCVB to throw them under the bus.
Where can I find the list of suppliers who are approved to sell to MA?
My point was that I don't think it was reasonable or realistic to expect MA FLLs to defy the AG, however nice it might've been. Furthermore, there are several FFLs that have demonstrated a commitment to fight the 7/20 (and general MA firearms law) nonsense. I think those that have done so deserve our encouragement rather than our scorn.
But may those that work against us receive their just deserts.
Is that a legal use of that system? I was under the impression that the data was there for tracing history of a firearm, not for the pro-active searching of transactions.
Is that a legal use of that system? I was under the impression that the data was there for tracing history of a firearm, not for the pro-active searching of transactions.
Just more evidence that nothing good comes from fohtay
Is that a legal use of that system? I was under the impression that the data was there for tracing history of a firearm, not for the pro-active searching of transactions.
They are all ****ing out of control, but who is going to stop them? Faker?
377 Posts to get here. I myself thought, "of course they got someone, a non shooter with an LTC, who owns something in .40, to co-operate in the story"
Might have missed it somewhere in this thread, but did anyone recognise the helpful individual who supposedly alerted the news after he got his 2k AK rounds?
Is that a legal use of that system? I was under the impression that the data was there for tracing history of a firearm, not for the pro-active searching of transactions.
When Romney was governor the attitude of EOPS is that the AG did not get this kind of access to that system unless it was for a VERY specific law enforcement purpose, and the request had to be submitted formally, etc. Even then information supplied to the AG was often redacted; EG, if the AG was investigating a specific dealer, the buyer info (name, address, LTC etc) would be completely redacted from the output that the AGs office received. Those records were considered protected, like the same way that a LEO can't run plate numbers through his RMV access "just for the hell of it" or "because his friend asked him to do it, because he's trying to figure out this dude that keeps picking up his daughter in front of his house" etc. Under Romney EOPS was actually relatively nonpartisan; and there was this idea that the privacy of those records was important; eg, to preserve public trust in the system. We knew it would get bad during Uhaul, but nobody would have imagined that once Baker showed up, that it would actually get far worse and that EOPS would basically roll out the red carpet for the AGs office, to just let them look at anything they want, anytime they wanted.
-Mike
Never mind the fohtay part.
I like how they specifically emphasized "Full Metal Jacket" . You could tell they thought it was something extra evil.
And here I was under the impression the AG was the State's lawyer and not law enforcement.
Looking for what though? Non-MA compliant guns?
Ostensibly yes. However, it's really about intimidation.Glocks and "assault weapons" from what I was told a little while back.